* using git without blobs in the object database
@ 2005-07-07 12:10 Bryan Larsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bryan Larsen @ 2005-07-07 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Use Case: A large set of large binary files, geographically
distributed. Each location has some unique files, some identical files
and some slightly modified files.
I want to use git to tell me what changed and when. But I cannot afford
to have it store the blobs in the object database, nor do I need to;
knowing the signature of previous objects is good enough.
It seems to me that most operations should work without these objects,
and that some people do so. For instance, git-update-cache has a
--cacheinfo option that facilitates this operation.
But not all commands work so well. For instance, git-write-tree will
fail if --cacheinfo was used to add a file. This failure is caused by a
call to check_valid_sha1(). It appears that this check is not strictly
necessary, just very useful for normal operation.
Would a patch that added a flag "--disable-sha1-check" to git-write-tree
be accepted? I hope that's all I need to add, but I haven't completed
my evaluation yet.
thanks,
Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-07-07 12:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-07 12:10 using git without blobs in the object database Bryan Larsen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.