From: Marcel Selhorst <selhorst@crypto.rub.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kjhall@us.ibm.com, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Support for new chip type
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:42:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CDAFBA.5080005@crypto.rub.de> (raw)
Hello LKML,
after some corrections here is a newer patch supporting the Infineon Trusted Platform
Module SLD 9630 (TPM 1.1b), which is embedded on Intel-mainboards or in
HP/Fujitsu-Siemens/Toshiba-Notebooks.
The module fits the interfaces created by IBM and was patched against the
latest kernel-snapshot 2.6.13-rc2.
Further information about this module and a list of supported hardware can be
found here: http://www.prosec.rub.de/tpm
Best Regards,
Marcel Selhorst
Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <selhorst@crypto.rub.de>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig linux/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2005-06-29 23:00:53.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2005-07-06 21:35:29.000000000 +0000
@@ -35,5 +35,18 @@ config TCG_ATMEL
will be accessible from within Linux. To compile this driver
as a module, choose M here; the module will be called tpm_atmel.
+config TCG_INFINEON
+ tristate "Infineon Technologies SLD 9630 TPM Interface"
+ depends on TCG_TPM
+ ---help---
+ If you have a TPM security chip from Infineon Technologies
+ say Yes and it will be accessible from within Linux. To
+ compile this driver as a module, choose M here; the module
+ will be called tpm_infineon.
+ Further information on this driver and the supported hardware
+ can be found at http://www.prosec.rub.de/tpm
+ Note: To get debugging output into the module, you have to enable
+ CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG
+
endmenu
diff -uprN linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile linux/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
--- linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile 2005-06-29 23:00:53.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile 2005-07-06 21:35:29.000000000 +0000
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TPM) += tpm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_NSC) += tpm_nsc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL) += tpm_atmel.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_INFINEON) += tpm_infineon.o
diff -uprN linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
--- linux-2.6.12.2/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c 2005-07-07 14:56:27.000000000 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2005
+ * Marcel Selhorst <selhorst@crypto.rub.de>
+ * Applied Data Security Group
+ * Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Device Driver for the Infineon Technologies
+ * SLD 9630 TT Trusted Platform Module
+ * Specifications at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org
+ *
+ * Project-Homepage:
+ * http://www.prosec.rub.de/tpm
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the
+ * License.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include "tpm.h"
+
+/* Infineon specific delay definitions */
+enum infineon_tpm_delay {
+ TPM_MAX_WTX_PACKAGES = 50, /* maximum number of WTX-packages */
+ TPM_WTX_MSLEEP_TIME = 20, /* msleep-Time for WTX-packages */
+ TPM_MSLEEP_TIME = 3, /* msleep-Time --> Interval to check status register */
+ TPM_MAX_TRIES = 5000 /* gives number of max. msleep()-calls before
+ throwing timeout */
+};
+
+/* Infineon specific TPM data */
+enum infineon_tpm_specific {
+ TCPA_INFINEON_DEV_VEN_VALUE = 0x15D1,
+ TPM_DATA = (TPM_ADDR + 1) & 0xff
+};
+
+/* TPM header definitions */
+enum infineon_tpm_header {
+ TPM_VL_VER = 0x01,
+ TPM_VL_CHANNEL_CONTROL = 0x07,
+ TPM_VL_CHANNEL_PERSONALISATION = 0x0A,
+ TPM_VL_CHANNEL_TPM = 0x0B,
+ TPM_VL_CONTROL = 0x00,
+ TPM_INF_NAK = 0x15,
+ TPM_CTRL_WTX = 0x10,
+ TPM_CTRL_WTX_ABORT = 0x18,
+ TPM_CTRL_WTX_ABORT_ACK = 0x18,
+ TPM_CTRL_ERROR = 0x20,
+ TPM_CTRL_CHAININGACK = 0x40,
+ TPM_CTRL_CHAINING = 0x80,
+ TPM_CTRL_DATA = 0x04,
+ TPM_CTRL_DATA_CHA = 0x84,
+ TPM_CTRL_DATA_CHA_ACK = 0xC4
+};
+
+enum infineon_tpm_register {
+ WRFIFO = 0x00,
+ RDFIFO = 0x01,
+ STAT = 0x02,
+ CMD = 0x03
+};
+
+enum infineon_tpm_command_bits {
+ CMD_DIS = 0x00,
+ CMD_LP = 0x01,
+ CMD_RES = 0x02,
+ CMD_IRQC = 0x06
+};
+
+enum infineon_tpm_status_bits {
+ STAT_XFE = 0x00,
+ STAT_LPA = 0x01,
+ STAT_FOK = 0x02,
+ STAT_TOK = 0x03,
+ STAT_IRQA = 0x06,
+ STAT_RDA = 0x07
+};
+
+/* some outgoing values */
+enum infineon_tpm_values {
+ CHIP_ID1 = 0x20,
+ CHIP_ID2 = 0x21,
+ DAR = 0x30,
+ RESET_LP_IRQC_DISABLE = 0x41,
+ ENABLE_REGISTER_PAIR = 0x55,
+ IOLIMH = 0x60,
+ IOLIML = 0x61,
+ DISABLE_REGISTER_PAIR = 0xAA,
+ IDVENL = 0xF1,
+ IDVENH = 0xF2,
+ IDPDL = 0xF3,
+ IDPDH = 0xF4
+};
+
+static int number_of_wtx;
+
+static int empty_fifo(struct tpm_chip *chip, int clear_wrfifo)
+{
+ int status;
+ int check = 0;
+ int i;
+ int j = 0;
+
+ if (clear_wrfifo) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++) {
+ status = inb(chip->vendor->base + WRFIFO);
+ if (status == 0xff) {
+ if (check == 5)
+ break;
+ else
+ check++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ /* Note: The values which are currently in the FIFO of the TPM
+ are thrown away since there is no usage for them. Usually,
+ this has nothing to say, since the TPM will give its answer immediately
+ or will be aborted anyway, so the data here is usually garbage and useless.
+ We have to clean this, because the next communication with the TPM would
+ be rubbish, if there is still some old data in the Read FIFO.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ do {
+ status = inb(chip->vendor->base + RDFIFO);
+ status = inb(chip->vendor->base + STAT);
+ j++;
+ if (j == TPM_MAX_TRIES)
+ return -EIO;
+ } while ((status & (1 << STAT_RDA)) != 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int wait(struct tpm_chip *chip, int wait_for_bit)
+{
+
+ int status;
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < TPM_MAX_TRIES; i++) {
+ status = inb(chip->vendor->base + STAT);
+ if (status & 1 << wait_for_bit) /* check the status-register if wait_for_bit is set */
+ break;
+ msleep(TPM_MSLEEP_TIME);
+ }
+ if (i == TPM_MAX_TRIES) { /* when timeout occurs, print information and return -EIO */
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Timeout in wait(");
+ if (wait_for_bit == STAT_XFE)
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "STAT_XFE)\n");
+ if (wait_for_bit == STAT_RDA)
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "STAT_RDA)\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ return 0;
+};
+
+static void wait_and_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 sendbyte)
+{
+ wait(chip, STAT_XFE);
+ outb(sendbyte, chip->vendor->base + WRFIFO);
+}
+
+/* Note: WTX means Waiting-Time-Extension. Whenever the TPM
+needs more calculation time, it sends a WTX-package, which has to
+be acknowledged or aborted. This usually occurs if you are hammering
+the TPM with key creation. Set the maximum number of WTX-packages in
+the definitions above, if the number is reached, the waiting-time will be denied
+and the TPM command has to be resend.
+*/
+
+static void tpm_wtx(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+ number_of_wtx++;
+ dev_info(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Granting WTX (%02d / %02d)\n",
+ number_of_wtx, TPM_MAX_WTX_PACKAGES);
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_VL_VER);
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_CTRL_WTX);
+ wait_and_send(chip, 0x00);
+ wait_and_send(chip, 0x00);
+ msleep(TPM_WTX_MSLEEP_TIME);
+}
+
+static void tpm_wtx_abort(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+ dev_info(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Aborting WTX\n");
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_VL_VER);
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_CTRL_WTX_ABORT);
+ wait_and_send(chip, 0x00);
+ wait_and_send(chip, 0x00);
+ number_of_wtx = 0;
+ msleep(TPM_WTX_MSLEEP_TIME);
+}
+
+static int tpm_inf_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 * buf, size_t count)
+{
+ int i;
+ int ret;
+ u32 size = 0;
+
+ recv_begin:
+ /* start reading header */
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Receiving header: ");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ ret = wait(chip, STAT_RDA);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ buf[i] = inb(chip->vendor->base + RDFIFO);
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "%02x ", buf[i]);
+ }
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "\n");
+
+ if (buf[0] != TPM_VL_VER) {
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "Wrong transport protocol implementation!\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ if (buf[1] == TPM_CTRL_DATA) {
+ /* size of the data received */
+ size = ((buf[2] << 8) | buf[3]);
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "Number of bytes to copy: %d (0x%04x)\n", size, size);
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Receiving data: ");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+ wait(chip, STAT_RDA);
+ buf[i] = inb(chip->vendor->base + RDFIFO);
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "%02x ", buf[i]);
+ }
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "\n");
+
+ if ((size == 0x6D00) && (buf[1] == 0x80)) {
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "Error handling on vendor layer!\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
+ buf[i] = buf[i + 6];
+
+ size = size - 6;
+ return size;
+ }
+
+ if (buf[1] == TPM_CTRL_WTX) {
+ dev_info(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "WTX-package received\n");
+ if (number_of_wtx < TPM_MAX_WTX_PACKAGES) {
+ tpm_wtx(chip);
+ goto recv_begin;
+ } else {
+ tpm_wtx_abort(chip);
+ goto recv_begin;
+ }
+ }
+ if (buf[1] == TPM_CTRL_WTX_ABORT_ACK) {
+ dev_info(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "WTX-abort acknowledged\n");
+ return size;
+ }
+
+ if (buf[1] == TPM_CTRL_ERROR) {
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "ERROR-package received:\n");
+ if (buf[4] == TPM_INF_NAK)
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "-> Negative acknowledgement - retransmit commando!\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+static int tpm_inf_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 * buf, size_t count)
+{
+ int i;
+ int ret;
+ u8 count_high, count_low, count_4, count_3, count_2, count_1;
+ /* Disabling Reset, LP and IRQC */
+ outb(RESET_LP_IRQC_DISABLE, chip->vendor->base + CMD);
+
+ ret = empty_fifo(chip, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Timeout while clearing FIFO\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ ret = wait(chip, STAT_XFE);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ count_4 = (count & 0xff000000) >> 24;
+ count_3 = (count & 0x00ff0000) >> 16;
+ count_2 = (count & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
+ count_1 = (count & 0x000000ff);
+ count_high = ((count + 6) & 0xffffff00) >> 8;
+ count_low = ((count + 6) & 0x000000ff);
+
+ /* Sending Header */
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "Sending header %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
+ TPM_VL_VER, TPM_CTRL_DATA, count_high, count_low);
+
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_VL_VER);
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_CTRL_DATA);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_high);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_low);
+
+ count_high = 0;
+ count_low = 0;
+
+ count_high = (count & 0xffff0000);
+ count_low = (count & 0x0000ffff);
+
+ /* Sending Data Header */
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "Sending data %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x ", TPM_VL_VER,
+ TPM_VL_CHANNEL_TPM, count_4, count_3, count_2, count_1);
+
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_VL_VER);
+ wait_and_send(chip, TPM_VL_CHANNEL_TPM);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_4);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_3);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_2);
+ wait_and_send(chip, count_1);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ wait_and_send(chip, buf[i]);
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev, "%02x ", buf[i]);
+ }
+ dev_dbg(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
+ "\nSending data successful -> %d (0x%04x) from %d (0x%04x) data-bytes written\n",
+ count, count, i, i);
+ return count;
+}
+static void tpm_inf_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+ /* Nothing yet!
+ This has something to do with the internal functions
+ of the TPM. Abort isn't really necessary...
+ */
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(pubek, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_pubek, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(pcrs, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_pcrs, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(caps, S_IRUGO, tpm_show_caps, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(cancel, S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP, NULL, tpm_store_cancel);
+
+static struct attribute *inf_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_pubek.attr,
+ &dev_attr_pcrs.attr,
+ &dev_attr_caps.attr,
+ &dev_attr_cancel.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group inf_attr_grp = {.attrs = inf_attrs };
+
+static struct file_operations inf_ops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .llseek = no_llseek,
+ .open = tpm_open,
+ .read = tpm_read,
+ .write = tpm_write,
+ .release = tpm_release,
+};
+
+static struct tpm_vendor_specific tpm_inf = {
+ .recv = tpm_inf_recv,
+ .send = tpm_inf_send,
+ .cancel = tpm_inf_cancel,
+ .req_complete_mask = 0,
+ .req_complete_val = 0,
+ .attr_group = &inf_attr_grp,
+ .miscdev = {.fops = &inf_ops,},
+};
+
+static int __init tpm_inf_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
+ const struct pci_device_id *pci_id)
+{
+
+ int rc = 0;
+ u8 ioh;
+ u8 iol;
+ int vendorid[2];
+ int version[2];
+ int productid[2];
+ int status = 0;
+
+ if (pci_enable_device(pci_dev))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ dev_dbg(&pci_dev->dev, "LPC-bus found at 0x%x\n", pci_id->device);
+
+ /* query chip for its vendor, its version number a.s.o. */
+
+ outb(ENABLE_REGISTER_PAIR, TPM_ADDR);
+ outb(IDVENL, TPM_ADDR);
+ vendorid[1] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(IDVENH, TPM_ADDR);
+ vendorid[0] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(IDPDL, TPM_ADDR);
+ productid[1] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(IDPDH, TPM_ADDR);
+ productid[0] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(CHIP_ID1, TPM_ADDR);
+ version[1] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(CHIP_ID2, TPM_ADDR);
+ version[0] = inb(TPM_DATA);
+
+ if ((vendorid[1] == (TCPA_INFINEON_DEV_VEN_VALUE & 0xFF))
+ && ((vendorid[0] << 8) ==
+ (TCPA_INFINEON_DEV_VEN_VALUE & 0x00FF << 8))) {
+
+ /* read IO-ports from TPM */
+ outb(IOLIMH, TPM_ADDR);
+ ioh = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ outb(IOLIML, TPM_ADDR);
+ iol = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ tpm_inf.base = (ioh << 8) | iol;
+
+ if (tpm_inf.base == 0) {
+ dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "No IO-ports set!\n");
+ pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* activate register */
+ outb(DAR, TPM_ADDR);
+ outb(0x01, TPM_DATA);
+ outb(DAR, TPM_ADDR);
+ status = inb(TPM_DATA);
+ dev_dbg(&pci_dev->dev,
+ "Device activate register status : %x \n", status);
+ outb(DISABLE_REGISTER_PAIR, TPM_ADDR);
+
+ /* disable RESET, LP and IRQC */
+ outb(RESET_LP_IRQC_DISABLE, tpm_inf.base + CMD);
+
+ /* Finally, we're done, print some infos */
+ dev_info(&pci_dev->dev, "TPM found: "
+ "io base 0x%x, "
+ "chip version %02x%02x, "
+ "vendor id %x%x (Infineon), "
+ "product id %02x%02x"
+ "%s\n",
+ tpm_inf.base,
+ version[0], version[1],
+ vendorid[0], vendorid[1],
+ productid[0], productid[1], ((productid[0] == 0)
+ && (productid[1] ==
+ 6)) ?
+ " (SLD 9630 TT 1.1)" : "");
+
+ rc = tpm_register_hardware(pci_dev, &tpm_inf);
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;
+
+ } else {
+ dev_info(&pci_dev->dev, "No Infineon TPM found!\n");
+ pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+}
+
+static struct pci_device_id tpm_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = {
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801BA_0)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801CA_12)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801DB_0)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801DB_12)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801EB_0)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_0)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_1)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_2)},
+ {0,}
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, tpm_pci_tbl);
+
+static struct pci_driver inf_pci_driver = {
+ .name = "tpm_inf",
+ .id_table = tpm_pci_tbl,
+ .probe = tpm_inf_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(tpm_remove),
+ .suspend = tpm_pm_suspend,
+ .resume = tpm_pm_resume,
+};
+
+static int __init init_inf(void)
+{
+ return pci_register_driver(&inf_pci_driver);
+}
+
+static void __exit cleanup_inf(void)
+{
+ pci_unregister_driver(&inf_pci_driver);
+}
+
+module_init(init_inf);
+module_exit(cleanup_inf);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Marcel Selhorst <selhorst@crypto.rub.de>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for Infineon TPM SLD 9630 TT");
+MODULE_VERSION("1.4");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-07 22:42 Marcel Selhorst [this message]
2005-07-08 6:54 ` [PATCH] tpm: Support for new chip type Philipp Matthias Hahn
2005-07-08 7:16 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-07-09 19:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-10 12:35 ` Vojtech Pavlik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-05 12:49 Marcel Selhorst
2005-07-05 15:03 ` Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42CDAFBA.5080005@crypto.rub.de \
--to=selhorst@crypto.rub.de \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=kjhall@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.