All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
@ 2005-07-07 18:34 Vincent Hanquez
  2005-07-07 19:12 ` Andrew Theurer
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-07-07 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

Hi,

we are going to upgrade very soon the repository to 2.6.12.
meanwhile I'ld appreciate if some people could test the patch, and see
if there's no regressions or anything bad before everybody get to use it.

just get latest snapshot of unstable, then do:

mv linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/ linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/
mv patches/linux-2.6.11/ patches/linux-2.6.12/
rm patches/linux-2.6.12/agpgart.patch
rm patches/linux-2.6.12/i386-cpu-hotplug-updated-for-mm.patch
rm patches/linux-2.6.12/iomap.patch
rm patches/linux-2.6.12/linux-2.6.11.12.patch
rm patches/linux-2.6.12/udp-frag.patch

get the patch here:

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/temp/xen-upgrade-2612-rc2.diff.bz2

and apply it on top of your repository.

Cheers,
-- 
Vincent Hanquez

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 18:34 upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Vincent Hanquez
@ 2005-07-07 19:12 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-08  1:43 ` Chris Wright
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Theurer @ 2005-07-07 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Hanquez, xen-devel

On Thursday 07 July 2005 13:34, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are going to upgrade very soon the repository to 2.6.12.
> meanwhile I'ld appreciate if some people could test the patch, and
> see if there's no regressions or anything bad before everybody get to
> use it.

I'll run 2.6.12 patched and latest -unstable through my benchmarks here.

-Andrew

>
> just get latest snapshot of unstable, then do:
>
> mv linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/ linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/
> mv patches/linux-2.6.11/ patches/linux-2.6.12/
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/agpgart.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/i386-cpu-hotplug-updated-for-mm.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/iomap.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/linux-2.6.11.12.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/udp-frag.patch
>
> get the patch here:
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/temp/xen-upg
>rade-2612-rc2.diff.bz2
>
> and apply it on top of your repository.
>
> Cheers,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 18:34 upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Vincent Hanquez
  2005-07-07 19:12 ` Andrew Theurer
@ 2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2005-07-08  1:43 ` Chris Wright
  2 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Theurer @ 2005-07-07 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Hanquez, xen-devel

On Thursday 07 July 2005 13:34, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are going to upgrade very soon the repository to 2.6.12.
> meanwhile I'ld appreciate if some people could test the patch, and
> see if there's no regressions or anything bad before everybody get to
> use it.
>
> just get latest snapshot of unstable, then do:
>
> mv linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/ linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/
> mv patches/linux-2.6.11/ patches/linux-2.6.12/
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/agpgart.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/i386-cpu-hotplug-updated-for-mm.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/iomap.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/linux-2.6.11.12.patch
> rm patches/linux-2.6.12/udp-frag.patch
>
> get the patch here:
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/temp/xen-upg
>rade-2612-rc2.diff.bz2

on xenU:

# make
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  CHK     usr/initramfs_list
  CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `play_dead':
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: `per_cpu__cpu_state' 
undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
is reported only once
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: for each function it appears 
in.)
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
declaration of `type name'
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: invalid type argument of 
`unary *'
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
declaration of `type name'
arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: invalid type argument of 
`unary *'
make[1]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2

Did you come across this while building linux-2.6.12-xenU?

-Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
@ 2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
  2005-07-07 20:06     ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 21:12   ` upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Ryan Harper
  2005-07-08 16:04   ` Vincent Hanquez
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Larson @ 2005-07-07 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Theurer; +Cc: xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:30 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
>   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
>   CHK     usr/initramfs_list
>   CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `play_dead':
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: `per_cpu__cpu_state' 
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
> is reported only once
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: for each function it appears 
> in.)
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
> declaration of `type name'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: invalid type argument of 
> `unary *'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
> declaration of `type name'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: invalid type argument of 
> `unary *'
> make[1]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2
I'm getting the same.
-- 
Thanks,
Paul Larson
plars@linuxtestproject.org
http://www.linuxtestproject.org

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
@ 2005-07-07 20:06     ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 20:29       ` Paul Larson
  2005-07-07 23:02       ` [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade Ryan Harper
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Theurer @ 2005-07-07 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Larson; +Cc: xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez

On Thursday 07 July 2005 14:53, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:30 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> >   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> > make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
> >   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
> >   CHK     usr/initramfs_list
> >   CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `play_dead':
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: `per_cpu__cpu_state'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: (Each undeclared
> > identifier is reported only once
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: for each function it
> > appears in.)
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: warning: type defaults to `int'
> > in declaration of `type name'
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: invalid type argument of
> > `unary *'
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: warning: type defaults to `int'
> > in declaration of `type name'
> > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: invalid type argument of
> > `unary *'
> > make[1]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2
>
> I'm getting the same.

For now I am disabling hotplug_cpu.

-Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 20:06     ` Andrew Theurer
@ 2005-07-07 20:29       ` Paul Larson
  2005-07-07 23:02       ` [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade Ryan Harper
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Larson @ 2005-07-07 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Theurer; +Cc: xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --]

And another:

  CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/smpboot.o
  CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.o
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c: In function `get_smp_config':
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:700: error:
`isa_bus_to_virt_needs_PRIVILEGED_BUILD' undeclared (first use in this
function)
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:700: error: (Each undeclared identifier
is reported only once
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:700: error: for each function it appears
in.)
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c: In function `smp_scan_config':
arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:735: error:
`isa_bus_to_virt_needs_PRIVILEGED_BUILD' undeclared (first use in this
function)
make[4]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/mpparse.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/plars/xen/xen-unstable.hg/linux-2.6.12-xenU'
make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/plars/xen/xen-unstable.hg'
make[1]: *** [linux-2.6-xenU-build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/plars/xen/xen-unstable.hg'
make: *** [kernels] Error 1

-- 
Thanks,
Paul Larson
plars@linuxtestproject.org
http://www.linuxtestproject.org

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
@ 2005-07-07 21:12   ` Ryan Harper
  2005-07-08 16:04   ` Vincent Hanquez
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Harper @ 2005-07-07 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Theurer; +Cc: xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez

* Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> [2005-07-07 14:31]:
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 13:34, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are going to upgrade very soon the repository to 2.6.12.
> > meanwhile I'ld appreciate if some people could test the patch, and
> > see if there's no regressions or anything bad before everybody get to
> > use it.
> >
> > just get latest snapshot of unstable, then do:
> >
> > mv linux-2.6.11-xen-sparse/ linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/
> > mv patches/linux-2.6.11/ patches/linux-2.6.12/
> > rm patches/linux-2.6.12/agpgart.patch
> > rm patches/linux-2.6.12/i386-cpu-hotplug-updated-for-mm.patch
> > rm patches/linux-2.6.12/iomap.patch
> > rm patches/linux-2.6.12/linux-2.6.11.12.patch
> > rm patches/linux-2.6.12/udp-frag.patch
> >
> > get the patch here:
> >
> > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/temp/xen-upg
> >rade-2612-rc2.diff.bz2
> 
> on xenU:
> 
> # make
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
>   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
>   CHK     usr/initramfs_list
>   CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `play_dead':
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: `per_cpu__cpu_state' 
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
> is reported only once
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: for each function it appears 
> in.)
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
> declaration of `type name'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: invalid type argument of 
> `unary *'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: warning: type defaults to `int' in 
> declaration of `type name'
> arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: invalid type argument of 
> `unary *'
> make[1]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2

Looks like a host of CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU changes didn't make it into the
headers.  I'm cleaning this up and I'll post a patch if someone doesn't
beat me to it.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade
  2005-07-07 20:06     ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 20:29       ` Paul Larson
@ 2005-07-07 23:02       ` Ryan Harper
  2005-07-08  0:12         ` David Hopwood
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Harper @ 2005-07-07 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Theurer; +Cc: Paul Larson, xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez

* Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com> [2005-07-07 15:07]:
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 14:53, Paul Larson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:30 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > >   CHK     include/linux/version.h
> > > make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
> > >   CHK     include/linux/compile.h
> > >   CHK     usr/initramfs_list
> > >   CC      arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c: In function `play_dead':
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: `per_cpu__cpu_state'
> > > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: (Each undeclared
> > > identifier is reported only once
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: for each function it
> > > appears in.)
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: warning: type defaults to `int'
> > > in declaration of `type name'
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:119: error: invalid type argument of
> > > `unary *'
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: warning: type defaults to `int'
> > > in declaration of `type name'
> > > arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.c:125: error: invalid type argument of
> > > `unary *'
> > > make[1]: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
> > > make: *** [arch/xen/i386/kernel] Error 2
> >
> > I'm getting the same.
> 
> For now I am disabling hotplug_cpu.

The attached patch gets CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU compiling again.  I'll test
out the kernel tomorrow.  Not sure if domU should have LOCAL_APIC and
IO_APIC enabled, they use code in mpparse.c CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE was being
enabled but the code down that patch uses isa_bus_to_virt(_x) which
requires CONFIG_XEN_PHYSDEV_ACCESS , which most domU's don't have.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com


diffstat output:
 linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/Kconfig.debug |    2 -
 linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/i386/Kconfig  |    4 +-
 patches/linux-2.6.12/cpu_hotplug_fix.patch     |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
---
diff -urN a/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/i386/Kconfig foo/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/i386/Kconfig
--- a/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/i386/Kconfig	2005-07-07 17:31:37.000000000 -0500
+++ foo/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/i386/Kconfig	2005-07-07 17:14:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -716,12 +716,12 @@
 
 config X86_LOCAL_APIC
 	bool
-	depends on X86_UP_APIC || ((X86_VISWS || SMP) && !X86_VOYAGER)
+	depends on XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST && (X86_UP_APIC || ((X86_VISWS || SMP) && !X86_VOYAGER))
 	default y
 
 config X86_IO_APIC
 	bool
-	depends on X86_UP_IOAPIC || (SMP && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER))
+	depends on XEN_PRIVILEDGE_GUEST && (X86_UP_IOAPIC || (SMP && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER)))
 	default y
 
 config X86_VISWS_APIC
diff -urN a/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/Kconfig.debug foo/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/Kconfig.debug
--- a/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/Kconfig.debug	2005-07-07 17:31:37.000000000 -0500
+++ foo/linux-2.6.12-xen-sparse/arch/xen/Kconfig.debug	2005-07-07 16:44:53.000000000 -0500
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 
 config X86_MPPARSE
 	bool
-	depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && !X86_VISWS && X86
+	depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && !X86_VISWS && X86 && XEN_PHYSDEV_ACCESS
 	default y
 
 # X86_64
diff -urN a/patches/linux-2.6.12/cpu_hotplug_fix.patch foo/patches/linux-2.6.12/cpu_hotplug_fix.patch
--- a/patches/linux-2.6.12/cpu_hotplug_fix.patch	1969-12-31 18:00:00.000000000 -0600
+++ foo/patches/linux-2.6.12/cpu_hotplug_fix.patch	2005-07-07 17:50:24.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+diff -urN pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/cpu.h pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/cpu.h
+--- pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/cpu.h	2005-06-17 14:48:29.000000000 -0500
++++ pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/cpu.h	2005-07-07 17:40:44.777157769 -0500
+@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
+ #include <linux/cpu.h>
+ #include <linux/topology.h>
+ #include <linux/nodemask.h>
++#include <linux/percpu.h>
+ 
+ #include <asm/node.h>
+ 
+@@ -16,4 +17,5 @@
+ extern void arch_unregister_cpu(int);
+ #endif
+ 
++DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state);
+ #endif /* _ASM_I386_CPU_H_ */
+diff -urN pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/irq.h pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/irq.h
+--- pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/irq.h	2005-06-17 14:48:29.000000000 -0500
++++ pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/irq.h	2005-07-07 17:41:08.857793011 -0500
+@@ -38,4 +38,8 @@
+ extern int irqbalance_disable(char *str);
+ #endif
+ 
++#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
++extern void fixup_irqs(cpumask_t map);
++#endif
++
+ #endif /* _ASM_IRQ_H */
+diff -urN pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/smp.h pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/smp.h
+--- pristine-linux-2.6.12.orig/include/asm-i386/smp.h	2005-06-17 14:48:29.000000000 -0500
++++ pristine-linux-2.6.12/include/asm-i386/smp.h	2005-07-07 17:41:30.824723517 -0500
+@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
+ }
+ 
+ #endif
++
++extern int __cpu_disable(void);
++extern void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
+ #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
+ 
+ #define NO_PROC_ID		0xFF		/* No processor magic marker */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade
  2005-07-07 23:02       ` [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade Ryan Harper
@ 2005-07-08  0:12         ` David Hopwood
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Hopwood @ 2005-07-08  0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

Ryan Harper wrote:
>  config X86_IO_APIC
>  	bool
> -	depends on X86_UP_IOAPIC || (SMP && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER))
> +	depends on XEN_PRIVILEDGE_GUEST && (X86_UP_IOAPIC || (SMP && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER)))

Should be XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST.

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@blueyonder.co.uk>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 18:34 upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Vincent Hanquez
  2005-07-07 19:12 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
@ 2005-07-08  1:43 ` Chris Wright
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2005-07-08  1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vincent Hanquez; +Cc: xen-devel

* Vincent Hanquez (vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
> we are going to upgrade very soon the repository to 2.6.12.
> meanwhile I'ld appreciate if some people could test the patch, and see
> if there's no regressions or anything bad before everybody get to use it.

Still working nicely for me on x86_64.

thanks,
-chris

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted
  2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
  2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
  2005-07-07 21:12   ` upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Ryan Harper
@ 2005-07-08 16:04   ` Vincent Hanquez
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2005-07-08 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Theurer; +Cc: xen-devel, Vincent Hanquez

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:30:18PM -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> Did you come across this while building linux-2.6.12-xenU?

Sorry I didn't because I didn't turn on HOTPLUG_CPU (nor SMP for domU)
I've fix this one now, and trying to fix the other one and roll a
new patchset for testing ASAP

Thanks,
-- 
Vincent Hanquez

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-08 16:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-07 18:34 upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Vincent Hanquez
2005-07-07 19:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-07-07 19:30 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-07-07 19:53   ` Paul Larson
2005-07-07 20:06     ` Andrew Theurer
2005-07-07 20:29       ` Paul Larson
2005-07-07 23:02       ` [PATCH] fix CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG compile with 2.6.12 upgrade Ryan Harper
2005-07-08  0:12         ` David Hopwood
2005-07-07 21:12   ` upgrade 2.6.12 - testing wanted Ryan Harper
2005-07-08 16:04   ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-07-08  1:43 ` Chris Wright

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.