Re: Re: Where is place of arch independed companion chips?

[Andrey Volkov <avolkov@varma-el.com>]

Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 11:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 
>>>Good question.  I was about to submit a patch that created 
>>>drivers/platform because the toplevel driver for MQ11xx is a 
>>>platform_device driver.  Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>drivers/platform sounds good to me.
> 
> 
> In another thread (about the ucb1x00) we came up with the idea of
> drivers/mfd (mfd = multi function devices).
> 
> The core and platform specific parts would live here with suitable clear
> naming and the subsection specific parts that were separable would live
> in the appropriate place within the kernel.
> 
> Just another idea to add to the mix and removes the dilemma of a
> multifunction device with isn't platform based...
> 
drivers/mfd as drivers/mfd, I have not objections. Who will send the
patch first?

--
Regards
Andrey Volkov

P.S. Tony, Greg, may be it will someone from you? (I've in mind sn/ subdir)







-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click