* RE: [LARTC] service-based and ip-based shaping
@ 2005-08-02 16:02 Mihai Vlad
2005-08-03 14:12 ` Andy Furniss
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mihai Vlad @ 2005-08-02 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Thanks,
The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child
classes if I have 200 clients...
Let me explain the problem better
I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil)
1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority:
256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible)
256/1024 - HTTP
256/1024 - FTP
256/1024 - SSH, Games, etc
(I do not say that this is the best approach but it does not matter - it is
just an example)
2) Second task: Suppose I have previously shaped the traffic the way I want,
I need 200 classes for 200 clients in which to tell the rate and ceil for
each of them
16/512 - Client 1
16/256 - Client 2, etc
If I would have 200 clients and 10 types of services and childs to service
classes, this means 2000 client classes...
I was thinking of a funny setup:
Route the traffic to 2 IMQ's
-> First: traffic passes imq0 - and is shaped based on services
-> Second: traffic from imq0 is routed to imq1 - where it is shaped
based on IP of the client.
What do you think about this?
Mihai VLAD
__________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: Vinod Chandran [mailto:vinod_chandran@multitech.co.in]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:06 AM
To: Mihai Vlad
Subject: Re: [LARTC] sercice-based and ip-based shaping
Hi Mihai,
You could have a parent class based on services, then have children of
that parent class based on ips.
for eg,
lets say the root is 1:1,
have FTP service class as 1:2 , parent 1:1
and then have a child say 1:21, 1:22 and so on whose parent is 1:2.
I have used mark values to classify traffic.
As far as rate/ceil values are concerned..
have class 1:2 rate/ceil 128/512.
1:21 - 8/128
1:22 - 8/64 ..
and so on...
1:1(512)
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
|
|
1:2(FTP)(128/512)
1:3( Telnet)(384/512)
|
|
--------------------------------------
--------------------------
|
|
| |
1:21 (8/128) 1:22 (8/64)
1:31(128/384)
1:32(128/256)
Hope this helps you,
Regards,
Vinod C
Mihai Vlad wrote:
>Hello guys,
>
>I need to accomplish 2 tasks with one Linux router:
>
>1) Shape the traffic based on services (e.g. HTTP max 512 kbps, P2P max 128
>kbps - with a lower prio, etc)
>
>2) After I have classified the traffic based on services, I want to pass it
>to the clients with different rates/ceils (one client will get 8/128 kbps,
>other 8/64 kbps, etc). If all the users are downloading via P2P I do not
>want the whole traffic to exceed the P2P service ceil (the 128 kbps - as
>stated before).
>
>
>I know how to shape based on protocols and services. I know how to shape a
>connection based on IP's. But how do I combine the both? How should the
>Hierarchy look like.
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Mihai VLAD
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LARTC mailing list
>LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] service-based and ip-based shaping
2005-08-02 16:02 [LARTC] service-based and ip-based shaping Mihai Vlad
@ 2005-08-03 14:12 ` Andy Furniss
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2005-08-03 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Mihai Vlad wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> The only issue here is that for each service I need to create 200 child
> classes if I have 200 clients...
>
>
> Let me explain the problem better
>
> I have the following connection from my ISP: (1024/1024) (rate/ceil)
>
> 1) First, I want to divide the 1024 into smaller pieces based on priority:
> 256/256 - P2P (I want to limit the P2P traffic as much as possible)
> 256/1024 - HTTP
> 256/1024 - FTP
> 256/1024 - SSH, Games, etc
> (I do not say that this is the best approach but it does not matter - it is
> just an example)
>
> 2) Second task: Suppose I have previously shaped the traffic the way I want,
> I need 200 classes for 200 clients in which to tell the rate and ceil for
> each of them
> 16/512 - Client 1
> 16/256 - Client 2, etc
>
> If I would have 200 clients and 10 types of services and childs to service
> classes, this means 2000 client classes...
>
> I was thinking of a funny setup:
>
> Route the traffic to 2 IMQ's
> -> First: traffic passes imq0 - and is shaped based on services
> -> Second: traffic from imq0 is routed to imq1 - where it is shaped
> based on IP of the client.
>
> What do you think about this?
I think you will need to use imq but I would just use 1 and do the
second level shaping on the real interface(s).
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-03 14:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-02 16:02 [LARTC] service-based and ip-based shaping Mihai Vlad
2005-08-03 14:12 ` Andy Furniss
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.