Re: tidy up requested

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>]

Ok, I'm writing up the patch for this right now.  Just want to confirm 
the following is all sane:

Ian Pratt wrote:

>install > find . -type f | grep -v /lib/modules | grep -v /boot
>./usr/lib/libxc.so.3.0.0
>./usr/lib/libxc.a
>./usr/lib/libxenstore.a
>./usr/lib/libxenstore-pic.a
>
>  
>
/usr/lib/libxenctl.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libxenctl.a
/usr/lib/libxenstore.a
/usr/lib/libxenstore-pic.a

Why are we installed libxenstore as a PIC .a and a normal .a and not as 
just a shared object and a normal .a?

>I guess the above are OK.  Makes me wander whether we should
>rename libxc to libxenc ???
>
>./usr/include/xc.h
>./usr/include/xs.h
>./usr/include/xs_lib.h
>./usr/include/xcs_proto.h
>  
>
/usr/include/xen/xenctl.h
/usr/include/xen/xenstore.h
/usr/include/xen/xenstore_lib.h

(we no longer need to install xcs_proto.h)

Everything else on Ian's list seems to be universally agreed upon.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>Should the above be under a /usr/include/xen too?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>  
>