From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
SYSLINUX@zytor.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43162B6A.2010806@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050831220717.GA14625@taniwha.stupidest.org>
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:01:57PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>>Maybe not. Another option would simply be to bump it up
>>significantly (2x isn't really that much.) 4096, maybe.
>
> I wonder if we're not at the point where we need something different
> to what we have now. The concept of a command-line works for passing
> simple state but for more complex things it's too cumbersome.
Well, we have initramfs for the really big stuff. The kernel shouldn't
really need that much data, though.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4315B668.6030603@gmail.com>
2005-08-31 21:29 ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 21:57 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:12 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:14 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-01 8:54 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-08-31 22:12 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-08-31 22:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-01 20:48 ` [syslinux] " Peter Jones
2005-09-06 20:19 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-09-06 20:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-06 20:49 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-06 22:49 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 12:44 ` [PATCH] " Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 13:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-10-10 13:32 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 13:57 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 14:07 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 14:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 14:59 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 15:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 16:23 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 17:02 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 15:46 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 15:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 18:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 20:36 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 8:32 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 16:50 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 17:44 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 19:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 20:04 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-13 20:18 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 1:48 ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-10-11 1:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43162B6A.2010806@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=SYSLINUX@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.