From: Georg Lippold <georg.lippold@gmx.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:46:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434A8CE8.2020404@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <434A8082.9060202@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> Would it make sense to make it 1024 everywhere (and maybe move it out
>> of arch specific files and just set it in one central place) ?
>>
>
> I would agree with that, *BUT* the boot protocol on each architecture
> need to be consistent.
> At the very least, though, i386 and x86-64 need to be changed together,
> since they use the same bootstrap.
I think it will take rather long to synchronize all archs. Maybe x86 can
fix it fast (it would ease the making of LiveCD's) and then initiate a
standardization on lkml? Knoppix has its kernel patch for over a year
now and I asked gentoo to do so, too. But they said, I should ask for it
here... Until the fix is in the distributions-kernel, probably another
month will pass and it obviously needs to be fixed.
Greetings,
Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4315B668.6030603@gmail.com>
2005-08-31 21:29 ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 21:57 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:12 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:14 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-01 8:54 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-08-31 22:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-01 20:48 ` [syslinux] " Peter Jones
2005-09-06 20:19 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-09-06 20:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-06 20:49 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-06 22:49 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 12:44 ` [PATCH] " Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 13:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-10-10 13:32 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 13:57 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 14:07 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 14:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 14:59 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 15:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 16:23 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 17:02 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 15:46 ` Georg Lippold [this message]
2005-10-10 15:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 18:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 20:36 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 8:32 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 16:50 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 17:44 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 19:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 20:04 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-13 20:18 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 1:48 ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-10-11 1:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434A8CE8.2020404@gmx.de \
--to=georg.lippold@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.