From: Brett Russ <russb@emc.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] libata: Marvell SATA support (PIO mode)
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 10:40:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <431EFBD0.1040509@emc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431E8104.2090100@pobox.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> applied
>
There are some issues with this. One of which I fixed and the other is
a bit confusing. The one I fixed concerned the 5xxx chips not
supporting the master reset functionality. The other problem has been
reported by 2 people so far. I have a stack trace from each of them:
Stack 1: (from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/5280)
PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 0000:02:08.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 5 with 0000:00:1d.0
IRQ routing conflict for 0000:02:08.0, have irq 9, want irq 5
ata1: SATA max PIO4 cmd 0x0 ctl 0xF8A22120 bmdma 0x0 irq 9
ata2: SATA max PIO4 cmd 0x0 ctl 0xF8A24120 bmdma 0x0 irq 9
ata3: SATA max PIO4 cmd 0x0 ctl 0xF8A26120 bmdma 0x0 irq 9
ata4: SATA max PIO4 cmd 0x0 ctl 0xF8A28120 bmdma 0x0 irq 9
Badness in __sata_phy_reset at drivers/scsi/libata-core.c:1413
[<f88e8f0c>] __sata_phy_reset+0x75/0x12e [libata]
[<f883f62f>] mv_phy_reset+0xbf/0x11e [sata_mv]
[<c0250f16>] end_that_request_last+0x6c/0x7e
[<f883f3bf>] mv_host_intr+0xd6/0x142 [sata_mv]
[<f883f500>] mv_interrupt+0xd5/0x145 [sata_mv]
[<c0107e2b>] handle_IRQ_event+0x25/0x4f
[<c01087d3>] do_IRQ+0x18a/0x2bf
=======================
[<c030fb7c>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
[<f883f618>] mv_phy_reset+0xa8/0x11e [sata_mv]
[<c01091d8>] setup_irq+0x179/0x181
[<f883f42b>] mv_interrupt+0x0/0x145 [sata_mv]
[<f88e8e25>] ata_bus_probe+0xe/0x7b [libata]
[<f88eb34d>] ata_device_add+0x186/0x202 [libata]
[<f883f97a>] mv_init_one+0x197/0x1d5 [sata_mv]
[<c01ec15d>] pci_device_probe_static+0x2a/0x3d
[<c01ec18b>] __pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2c
[<c01ec1b7>] pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2d
[<c024a33b>] bus_match+0x27/0x45
[<c024a404>] driver_attach+0x37/0x66
[<c024a7b9>] bus_add_driver+0x77/0x97
[<c024abd4>] driver_register+0x51/0x58
[<c01ec375>] pci_register_driver+0x85/0xa1
[<f881a00a>] mv_init+0xa/0x15 [sata_mv]
[<c013d5a3>] sys_init_module+0x1f1/0x2d9
[<c030fa37>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
bad: scheduling while atomic!
[<c030d515>] schedule+0x2d/0x552
[<c0107e2b>] handle_IRQ_event+0x25/0x4f
[<c030e40e>] schedule_timeout+0xf1/0x10c
[<c012ad7e>] process_timeout+0x0/0x5
[<f883f082>] mv_scr_read+0xf/0x54 [sata_mv]
[<c012b498>] msleep+0x4e/0x54
[<f88e8f3f>] __sata_phy_reset+0xa8/0x12e [libata]
[<f883f62f>] mv_phy_reset+0xbf/0x11e [sata_mv]
[<c0250f16>] end_that_request_last+0x6c/0x7e
[<f883f3bf>] mv_host_intr+0xd6/0x142 [sata_mv]
[<f883f500>] mv_interrupt+0xd5/0x145 [sata_mv]
[<c0107e2b>] handle_IRQ_event+0x25/0x4f
[<c01087d3>] do_IRQ+0x18a/0x2bf
=======================
[<c030fb7c>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
[<f883f618>] mv_phy_reset+0xa8/0x11e [sata_mv]
[<c01091d8>] setup_irq+0x179/0x181
[<f883f42b>] mv_interrupt+0x0/0x145 [sata_mv]
[<f88e8e25>] ata_bus_probe+0xe/0x7b [libata]
[<f88eb34d>] ata_device_add+0x186/0x202 [libata]
[<f883f97a>] mv_init_one+0x197/0x1d5 [sata_mv]
[<c01ec15d>] pci_device_probe_static+0x2a/0x3d
[<c01ec18b>] __pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2c
[<c01ec1b7>] pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2d
[<c024a33b>] bus_match+0x27/0x45
[<c024a404>] driver_attach+0x37/0x66
[<c024a7b9>] bus_add_driver+0x77/0x97
[<c024abd4>] driver_register+0x51/0x58
[<c01ec375>] pci_register_driver+0x85/0xa1
[<f881a00a>] mv_init+0xa/0x15 [sata_mv]
[<c013d5a3>] sys_init_module+0x1f1/0x2d9
[<c030fa37>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Stack 2: (from off list email)
scheduling while atomic: klogd/0x00010000/1572
[<c0343524>] schedule+0xab4/0xbf0
[<c01200bf>] scheduler_tick+0x15f/0x380
[<c012dbe0>] lock_timer_base+0x20/0x50
[<c012dcb8>] __mod_timer+0xa8/0xd0
[<c0343eee>] schedule_timeout+0x4e/0xc0
[<c012e790>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
[<c012ebb0>] msleep+0x30/0x40
[<f89d914a>] __sata_phy_reset+0x4a/0x120 [libata]
[<c0114b72>] delay_pmtmr+0x12/0x20
[<f899051a>] mv_phy_reset+0x7a/0x140 [sata_mv]
[<c02857f2>] ide_end_request+0x92/0xb0
[<f899035e>] mv_host_intr+0xce/0x120 [sata_mv]
[<f8990457>] mv_interrupt+0xa7/0xf0 [sata_mv]
[<c0149fe3>] handle_IRQ_event+0x33/0x70
[<c014a0f9>] __do_IRQ+0xd9/0x150
[<c0106847>] do_IRQ+0x57/0xa0
=======================
[<c0104c4a>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<c013007b>] __group_send_sig_info+0x2b/0xd0
[<c01247f8>] do_syslog+0xe8/0x3e0
[<c0104cd8>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x1c/0x24
[<c013a0c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[<c013a0c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[<c01a8090>] kmsg_read+0x0/0x50
[<c016c368>] vfs_read+0xb8/0x170
[<c016c701>] sys_read+0x41/0x70
[<c01041bb>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
So it looks like mv_phy_reset() is getting called from interrupt level,
and it calls __sata_phy_reset() which sleeps.
I only call mv_phy_reset() as part of fatal error interrupt cleanup.
The chip does take an "error" interrupt upon drive connection but that's
not fatal. Either way, mv_phy_reset() is called from mv_err_intr()
which doesn't appear in either of the stack dumps above.
Possible solutions:
-change __sata_phy_reset() to do a mdelay rather than msleep?
-do the phy_reset part of error recovery after returning from interrupt
handler?
Thoughts?
BR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-07 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 18:36 [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13] Marvell SATA support (PIO mode) Brett Russ
2005-08-30 20:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 14:27 ` [PATCH 2.6.13] libata: " Brett Russ
2005-09-01 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-01 19:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 19:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-01 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 20:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 20:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-01 20:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-01 22:26 ` Brett Russ
2005-09-02 1:32 ` Brett Russ
2005-09-02 17:16 ` Bogdan Costescu
2005-09-02 17:16 ` Bogdan Costescu
2005-09-02 17:55 ` Ray Lee
2005-09-07 5:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-07 14:40 ` Brett Russ [this message]
2005-09-07 16:31 ` Bogdan Costescu
2005-09-07 16:31 ` Bogdan Costescu
2005-09-03 14:08 ` Tyler
2005-09-03 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-27 5:36 ` Tyler
2005-09-27 5:36 ` Tyler
2005-08-31 10:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13] " Jiri Slaby
2005-08-31 11:37 ` Brett Russ
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-01 20:19 [PATCH 2.6.13] libata: " linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=431EFBD0.1040509@emc.com \
--to=russb@emc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.