Re: New ideas on implementation on libsetrans.

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>]

Stephen Smalley wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:19 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  
>
>>Ok I succumb, but we will go back to original implementation of 
>>libsetrans for now, and require anyone wishing to change the behaviour 
>>to replace our version with their own.  so dlopen(libsetrans.so.1) will 
>>work.
>>
>>Eventually our version of libsetrans will use a UDS interface to talk to 
>>a long running daemon.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok.  Do you agree that libselinux should be dlopen'ing libsetrans.so
>(and thus using the symlink that already exists under /usr/lib to
>whatever the latest version is under /lib) rather than specifically
>dlopen'ing libsetrans.so.0 as it does now?  Of course, it may not matter
>in practice as I can't see the interface ever changing (at least in a
>way that requires bumping the .so version), but it seems cleaner.  
>
>  
>
I agree.  Open /usr/lib/libsetrans.so

-- 



--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.