All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrics@interia.pl,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:37:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <432835B4.7070405@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43278116.8020403@in.ibm.com>

Sripathi Kodi wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
>> I don't think this is wrong per se, but you shouldn't take the 
>> tasklist lock normally. You're better off just doing
> 
> 
> Linus,
> 
> I incarporated the path that doesn't hold tasklist lock unnecessarily. 
> The patch is below. This seems to work without any problems for me.
> 
> If the decision is to remove ->permission, I can send a small patch I 
> have that removes .permission entry from proc_task_inode_operations. 
> Either way fixes the problem I found.

Let me say that this solution, and any other which loops through all 
threads of a task, isn't going to scale well. I don't have a magic O(1) 
solution, if it were easy someone would have done that instead of the 
while loop, just noting that a clever solution would be a win on servers.

> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Sripathi.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.13.1-orig/fs/proc/base.c    2005-09-14 03:46:22.000000000 
> -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.13.1/fs/proc/base.c    2005-09-14 03:48:35.000000000 -0500
> @@ -275,11 +275,33 @@ static int proc_root_link(struct inode *
>  {
>      struct fs_struct *fs;
>      int result = -ENOENT;
> -    task_lock(proc_task(inode));
> -    fs = proc_task(inode)->fs;
> -    if(fs)
> +    struct task_struct *leader = proc_task(inode);
> +
> +    task_lock(leader);
> +    fs = leader->fs;
> +    if (fs) {
>          atomic_inc(&fs->count);
> -    task_unlock(proc_task(inode));
> +        task_unlock(leader);
> +    } else {
> +        /* Try to get fs from sub-threads */
> +        task_unlock(leader);
> +        struct task_struct *task = leader;
> +        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +        if (pid_alive(task)) {
> +            while ((task = next_thread(task)) != leader) {
> +                task_lock(task);
> +                fs = task->fs;
> +                if (fs) {
> +                    atomic_inc(&fs->count);
> +                    task_unlock(task);
> +                    break;
> +                }
> +                task_unlock(task);
> +            }
> +        }
> +        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +    }
> +
>      if (fs) {
>          read_lock(&fs->lock);
>          *mnt = mntget(fs->rootmnt);
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-14 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-12 17:46 [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-12 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-13 13:10   ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-13 14:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-13 16:51       ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 17:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-13 17:12           ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 21:30             ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-13 21:56               ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-13 21:57               ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 23:10               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-14  1:47                 ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-14  1:52                   ` Al Viro
2005-09-14 14:37                   ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-09-15  0:30                     ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-14  1:50                 ` Al Viro
2005-09-15  0:31                   ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-15  0:55                     ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-15  1:38                       ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-15  2:12                         ` Al Viro
2005-09-15  7:29                           ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-15  1:18                     ` Al Viro
2005-09-16  0:54                       ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-16  7:46                         ` Al Viro
2005-09-16 15:06                           ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-16 18:05                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-16 18:14                             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=432835B4.7070405@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=patrics@interia.pl \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=sripathik@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.