Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam?

[Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@mch.one.pl>]

David Masover schrieb:

(...)

>> And it's not really true that spamassassin is a manual-rule-based 
>> filter only.
> 
> 
> Right, but the statistical/learning component of spamassassin is just 
> that -- a component, to be combined with razor/pyzor, manual rules, and 
> anything else they can think of.  I think dspam does a much better job 
> at being a statistical filter, and that's all it does -- and that's all 
> it needs to.  Some people have reported 99.997% accuracy from dspam, 
> beating humans.
> 
> Anyway, the articles are about the principle of the thing.  A 
> statistical filter will beat a manual one every time, because it's 
> faster and better at coming up with rules, and you don't need to update 
> your definitions to start filtering the new spam -- just train on two or 
> three mails, and you're done.

yeah, but this starts to be a bit off-topic now.

in case of reiser list it would be good if it had *any* filter that had 
even 50% accuracy, for a start :)


-- 
Tomek