Re: vs, can you port to 2.6.13 and put the port on our website as part of analyzing the latest patches added to the -mm series and their impact on reiser4 performance

["Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>]

Hello

Hans Reiser wrote:
> ;-)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hans
> 
> Islam Amer wrote:
> 
>>On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
>> 
>>
>>>Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than
>>>the others for most applications.  Anticipatory used to be the best, but
>>>cfq-3 is better now.
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>Yes I always had my eyes on the applicable parts of -ck patchset
>>becasue they showed good promise ( upto my limited understading ). I
>>just needed an educated opinion. Thanks.
>>
>>And  I had to drop using the genetic-as because it oopsed with
>>reiserfs in some kernels.
>>
>>Problem is lots of experimental patches in -mm series hurt throughput
>>and performance and reiser4 users have to suffer. Otherwise we have to
>>go through the slightly non-trivial procedure of patching the vanilla
>>kernel.
>>

reiser4 for 2.6.13 can be obtained at
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.13/