From: "Sébastien Bernard" <seb@frankengul.org>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix iptables on systems with discontiguous processor ids
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:48:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434AE1A0.5030400@frankengul.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051010164141.GG5627@rama>
Harald Welte a écrit :
>Hi Dave!
>
>This is my proposed patch for the problem you've described. Please test
>and submit. If it works, I'll also prepare a patch for {arp,ip6}_tables.
>
>
>[NETFILTER] ip_tables: fix per cpu handling
>
>As David Miller points out, the "smp_processor_id()'s" are not always
>contiguous. Esp. some boxes like Sun Ultra60 have CPU 0 and 2 installed in
>one system, but no "1". Therefore the current logic of how iptables
>manages the per cpu copies of the ruleset is broken. This patch is
>supposed to fix it.
>
>Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
>
>---
>commit e759eaa9e9e92330c5fcfd760d767d4f39375a03
>tree 63b96f7df57f51dc7e284969c3a08b9264cc2c5f
>parent 1ab8dccdbf16c09f8da124fc4c82024de24dfae2
>author Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:29:24 +0200
>committer Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:29:24 +0200
>
>[snip]
>
>
I tested this patch on my machine.
It ooops instantly in get_counters() from ip_tables.c.
Seb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 16:41 [PATCH] fix iptables on systems with discontiguous processor ids Harald Welte
2005-10-10 21:15 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-10 21:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-10 21:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-10 22:06 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-11 14:23 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 19:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 6:36 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-10 22:04 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-10 21:46 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 13:54 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-10-11 14:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-11 17:45 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 22:57 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 7:00 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-13 22:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-10-17 4:18 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-11 10:44 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 17:15 ` Bart De Schuymer
2005-10-11 17:55 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 17:54 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 21:54 ` Sébastien Bernard
2005-10-11 22:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 6:22 ` seb
2005-10-12 6:31 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 7:04 ` Sébastien Bernard
2005-10-12 7:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 6:43 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-12 22:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-13 7:18 ` seb
2005-10-13 19:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-13 8:46 ` Herbert Xu
2005-10-13 21:14 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-13 22:37 ` seb
2005-10-14 18:33 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-10 21:48 ` Sébastien Bernard [this message]
2005-10-11 14:23 ` Harald Welte
2005-10-11 20:59 ` Sébastien Bernard
2005-10-11 21:33 ` David S. Miller
2005-10-12 6:40 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434AE1A0.5030400@frankengul.org \
--to=seb@frankengul.org \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.