All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is the repository broken?
@ 2005-10-21 12:05 Burns, Bill
  2005-10-21 16:18 ` David F Barrera
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Burns, Bill @ 2005-10-21 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel


The last pull that got me anything was on Oct 20
and the last changeset is:

changeset:   7425:7c951e3eb5ab
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
date:        Wed Oct 19 06:53:00 2005 +0100
summary:     Remove unused parameter from addControllerClass.  This
became unuse
d when the


I see more going by on the list. The web interface to
the repository shows the same tip.

Thanks,
 Bill Burns

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the repository broken?
@ 2005-10-21 16:41 Nakajima, Jun
  2005-10-21 16:49 ` Nivedita Singhvi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2005-10-21 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David F Barrera, Burns, Bill; +Cc: xen-devel

David F Barrera wrote:
> I saw the same thing. I just assumed that there had not been any
> checkins since yesterday.

This is basically what I memntioned in the previous email:

Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> I heard "the mini-regression test now in place between a staging tree
> and the public tree currently fails on some 64bit SMP cases and
> therefore all patches submitted after are still queued up in the
> staging tree."
> 
> I'm wondering how we can resolve that kind of situation effectively:
> - Can we get the results from mini-regression tests?
> - Can we access the staging tree to tell if the patch sent out has
> been accepted or not? We need to reproduce the tree and problem to
> fix the bug.
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center


> 
> David
> 
> Burns, Bill wrote:
> 
>> The last pull that got me anything was on Oct 20
>> and the last changeset is:
>> 
>> changeset:   7425:7c951e3eb5ab
>> tag:         tip
>> user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
>> date:        Wed Oct 19 06:53:00 2005 +0100
>> summary:     Remove unused parameter from addControllerClass.  This
>> became unuse d when the
>> 
>> 
>> I see more going by on the list. The web interface to
>> the repository shows the same tip.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Bill Burns
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Is the repository broken?
@ 2005-10-21 19:14 Nakajima, Jun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2005-10-21 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nivedita Singhvi; +Cc: David F Barrera, xen-devel, Burns, Bill

Looks like it's back now. I've got a bunch of Xen-changelog emails, and
checked the xenbits. The tip is:

78 minutes ago: Temporary workaround to xend start problem.  
changeset 7468: 17a9f111fa93 
parent 7467: 2d5b92e7c79a 
tag: tip 
author: jrb44@plym.cl.cam.ac.uk 
date: Fri Oct 21 17:51:42 2005 
files: tools/python/xen/util/process.py tools/python/xen/xend/Vifctl.py


Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nivedita Singhvi [mailto:niv@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 9:49 AM
To: Nakajima, Jun
Cc: David F Barrera; Burns, Bill; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is the repository broken?

Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> David F Barrera wrote:
> 
>>I saw the same thing. I just assumed that there had not been any
>>checkins since yesterday.
> 
> 
> This is basically what I memntioned in the previous email:
> 
> Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> 
>>I heard "the mini-regression test now in place between a staging tree
>>and the public tree currently fails on some 64bit SMP cases and
>>therefore all patches submitted after are still queued up in the
>>staging tree."
>>
>>I'm wondering how we can resolve that kind of situation effectively:
>>- Can we get the results from mini-regression tests?
>>- Can we access the staging tree to tell if the patch sent out has
>>been accepted or not? We need to reproduce the tree and problem to
>>fix the bug.
>>

Hello,

Is that what's going on? How can we help?

Is there a fifo operation in place? Can we perhaps remove
patches which fail and debug/process offline, perhaps post
to list and get testing, etc? Continue with regression
testing remaining queue?

thanks,
Nivedita

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-21 19:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-21 12:05 Is the repository broken? Burns, Bill
2005-10-21 16:18 ` David F Barrera
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-21 16:41 Nakajima, Jun
2005-10-21 16:49 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-10-21 19:14 Nakajima, Jun

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.