From: Hareesh Nagarajan <hnagar2@gmail.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] Error checks omitted in init_tmpfs() in mm/tiny-shmem.c
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:16:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435D7972.7020102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051024204518.GI26160@waste.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:56:47AM -0500, Hareesh Nagarajan wrote:
>> Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:29:45AM -0500, Hareesh Nagarajan wrote:
>>>> The existing code in init_tmpfs() in mm/tiny-shmem.c does not handle the
>>>> cases when the calls to register_filesystem() and kern_mount() fail.
>>>> This patch adds those checks.
[ Snip ]
> A couple more comments..
>
>> Signed-off-by: Hareesh Nagarajan <hnagar2@gmail.com>
>
>> --- linux-2.6.13.4/mm/tiny-shmem.c 2005-10-10 13:54:29.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6.13.4-edit/mm/tiny-shmem.c 2005-10-24 03:43:38.614071000 -0500
>> @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@
>>
>> static int __init init_tmpfs(void)
>> {
>> - register_filesystem(&tmpfs_fs_type);
>> + int error;
>> +
>> + error = register_filesystem(&tmpfs_fs_type);
>> + BUG_ON(error);
>
> Can we just do BUG_ON(register_filesystem() != 0)?
>
> Strictly speaking, the != 0 is redundant, but as this goes slightly
> against the grain of normal usage, it's a good indicator of intent.
It shows intent well. That goes into my book for good programming
practices. No more BUG_ON(foo) :)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
>> devfs_mk_dir("shm");
>> #endif
>> shm_mnt = kern_mount(&tmpfs_fs_type);
>> - return 0;
>> + BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shm_mnt));
>> +
>> + return error;
>
> We can never return non-zero here. Returning error implies we can, so
> it's confusing.
Makes sense again. Patch follows.
Signed-off-by: Hareesh Nagarajan <hnagar2@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #2: tiny-shmmem-fix-ver3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 462 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.13.4/mm/tiny-shmem.c 2005-10-10 13:54:29.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.13.4-edit/mm/tiny-shmem.c 2005-10-24 19:05:28.058897000 -0500
@@ -31,11 +31,14 @@
static int __init init_tmpfs(void)
{
- register_filesystem(&tmpfs_fs_type);
+ BUG_ON(register_filesystem(&tmpfs_fs_type) != 0);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
devfs_mk_dir("shm");
#endif
shm_mnt = kern_mount(&tmpfs_fs_type);
+ BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shm_mnt));
+
return 0;
}
module_init(init_tmpfs)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-25 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-24 5:29 [TRIVIAL] Error checks omitted in init_tmpfs() in mm/tiny-shmem.c Hareesh Nagarajan
2005-10-24 7:09 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-24 8:56 ` Hareesh Nagarajan
2005-10-24 20:45 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-24 21:00 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-24 21:08 ` Matt Mackall
2005-10-25 0:16 ` Hareesh Nagarajan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435D7972.7020102@gmail.com \
--to=hnagar2@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.