Re: RE: Updated XenMon Patch

[Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@hp.com>]

Jeffrey Buell wrote:

> Diwaker,
>
>I didn't mean to imply that XenMon is deficient in any way.  Only that it is
>a different kind of performance tool than, say, a function-level tool like
>Xenoprof.  XenMon works well for me now, the only suggestion I have is to
>improve the formatting of the notlive output:  some numbers are printed with
>12 significant figures and the columns are not well-aligned.
>  
>

Jeff,

The idea of the not-live output was that you'd read that stuff with a 
script and parse it, so little attention was given to making it look 
pretty. But I'll see what we can do to neaten it up a bit. Thanks again 
for using the tool and providing feedback!

Rob