Re: [ SEMANAGE ] Cleanup : move some things around

[Joshua Brindle <jbrindle@tresys.com>]

Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:22 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> 
>>>I'd prefer to hold cleanups until we have stabilized the functionality
>>>and interfaces as desired for test1.  I'm also not clear on why we want
>>>a sepol handle in the ps case.  
>>>  
>>
>>.. because we'll be using the sepol records either way, so we need the 
>>sepol handle..
>>Not using the sepol records requires copying them over into libsemanage.
> 
> 
> Hmmm..well, let's take that up again later.  Right now we need to deal
> with finalizing the boolean support (e.g. having libsemanage use
> security_set_boolean_list with permanent=0 to set the runtime boolean
> values upon commit rather than loading the generated binary policy
> file), and getting the migration steps in place for test1.
> 
> I committed your semanage_set_reload_bools() patch and my
> semanage_is_managed() patch to sourceforge cvs, but not the cleanup
> patch.
> 

Please see my other email about the semanage_set_reload_bools() patch, I 
  believe it is flawed in a couple ways and should be reverted.

Joshua



--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.