* [Adeos-main] [OLDGEN] adeos r17 patch for 2.4.27
@ 2005-10-28 7:51 Klaas Gadeyne
2005-11-09 23:38 ` Alexis Berlemont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Klaas Gadeyne @ 2005-10-28 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adeos-main
Hi,
I was encountering the gcc-3.4 problem when trying to compile rtai on
a 2.4.27 kernel with the adeos r16 patch included with rtai.
<https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010819.html>
and
<https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010701.html>
As I understood, this problem has been fixed in r17. I found this
announcement <https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010821.html>, but
the r17 patches seem to have dissappeared from download.gna.org?
Is it better to use the r18c1 candidate instead (speaking OLDGEN
patches, that is)? Or maybe, more appropriately, has development for
adeos 2.4 patches stopped with r18c1?
Thx,
Klaas Gadeyne
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Adeos-main] [OLDGEN] adeos r17 patch for 2.4.27
2005-10-28 7:51 [Adeos-main] [OLDGEN] adeos r17 patch for 2.4.27 Klaas Gadeyne
@ 2005-11-09 23:38 ` Alexis Berlemont
2005-11-10 20:17 ` Hannes Mayer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexis Berlemont @ 2005-11-09 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adeos-main
Hi,
Sorry for answering so late.
> I was encountering the gcc-3.4 problem when trying to compile rtai on
> a 2.4.27 kernel with the adeos r16 patch included with rtai.
> <https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010819.html>
> and
> <https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010701.html>
>
> As I understood, this problem has been fixed in r17. I found this
> announcement <https://mail.rtai.org/pipermail/rtai/2005-March/010821.html>,
> but the r17 patches seem to have dissappeared from download.gna.org?
>
> Is it better to use the r18c1 candidate instead (speaking OLDGEN
> patches, that is)? Or maybe, more appropriately, has development for
> adeos 2.4 patches stopped with r18c1?
The adeos 2.4 branch development has not been stopped but all the
modifications from the adeos 2.6 branch are not backported to 2.4.
The reason is not lack of time (but it could be), it is just not necessary
considering the use of this patch branch (kilauea, vesuvio,... but not
xenomai).
The candidate release 18 was released at least two months ago. You can use it.
It can be considered as stable. I have not noticed any problem reported. I am
working on something else this moment, I still have not found the time to
update the r18c1 patches to stable; but it will be done.
Regards.
Alexis.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Adeos-main] [OLDGEN] adeos r17 patch for 2.4.27
2005-11-09 23:38 ` Alexis Berlemont
@ 2005-11-10 20:17 ` Hannes Mayer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Mayer @ 2005-11-10 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexis Berlemont; +Cc: adeos-main
Ciao Alexis!
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
[...]
> The adeos 2.4 branch development has not been stopped but all the
> modifications from the adeos 2.6 branch are not backported to 2.4.
Does that mean that only bug fixes go into the 2.4 oldgen branch,
but not e.g. feature "modifications" done in the 2.6 branch ?
Thanks and best regards,
Hannes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-10 20:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-28 7:51 [Adeos-main] [OLDGEN] adeos r17 patch for 2.4.27 Klaas Gadeyne
2005-11-09 23:38 ` Alexis Berlemont
2005-11-10 20:17 ` Hannes Mayer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.