* [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping
@ 2005-11-10 22:50 Igor Krneta
2005-11-11 0:25 ` Corey Hickey
2005-11-11 18:28 ` andreas.klauer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Igor Krneta @ 2005-11-10 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello,
My company recently upgraded our internet connection and I need to set
up shaping. I was wondering , what are the CPU and RAM requirements for
shaping 768/768 DSL line ?
I have a few old P III's (450 MHz, 256 RAM) and some VIA Eden (533 MHz,
512 RAM) boxes lying around. Which one would be most appropriate ?
That box would be a shaping only box, and all internet traffic would go
through it.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping
2005-11-10 22:50 [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping Igor Krneta
@ 2005-11-11 0:25 ` Corey Hickey
2005-11-11 18:28 ` andreas.klauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corey Hickey @ 2005-11-11 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Igor Krneta wrote:
> Hello,
> My company recently upgraded our internet connection and I need to set
> up shaping. I was wondering , what are the CPU and RAM requirements for
> shaping 768/768 DSL line ?
Not much. I help take care of a P1-200 with 96MB RAM that does
firewalling, NAT, shaping, and load balancing for a T1 and a 6000/600
ADSL line. It never comes close to having to work hard.
> I have a few old P III's (450 MHz, 256 RAM) and some VIA Eden (533 MHz,
> 512 RAM) boxes lying around. Which one would be most appropriate ?
Use whichever one you expect to be stable -- you don't want to have to
deal with crashes. Otherwise, I would use the faster machine just
because it'll be quicker to set up and administrate.
-Corey
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping
2005-11-10 22:50 [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping Igor Krneta
2005-11-11 0:25 ` Corey Hickey
@ 2005-11-11 18:28 ` andreas.klauer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: andreas.klauer @ 2005-11-11 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Quoting Igor Krneta <warlord@trust-b.com>:
> My company recently upgraded our internet connection and I need to
> set up shaping. I was wondering , what are the CPU and RAM
> requirements for shaping 768/768 DSL line ?
It all depends on how complicated you want your shaping setup to be and
how many
clients you have to serve. For example, in my home network with 5 client
machines (and something like 10 classes / 5 filters per client), the old PII
machine with 128MB of RAM I was using for this task was 95% idle all of the
time...
If you have thousands of classes and just as many filters, it probably
would be
different, though.
> I have a few old P III's (450 MHz, 256 RAM) and some VIA Eden (533
> MHz, 512 RAM) boxes lying around. Which one would be most appropriate
> ?
I think it's quite safe to say that in a normal setup any of these should be
more than sufficient.
HTH
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-11 18:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-10 22:50 [LARTC] cpu power needed for shaping Igor Krneta
2005-11-11 0:25 ` Corey Hickey
2005-11-11 18:28 ` andreas.klauer
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.