Re: A question: May Reiser4 be equivalent to Reiser3 with some flag/plugin ...

["Giovanni A. Orlando" <gorlando@futuretg.com>]

Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:

>Hello
>
>On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 08:28 +0000, Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>    Looking the http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz article, I 
>>see that
>>    in some cases ReiserFS 3.X is better than Reiser4.
>>
>>    Correct me if I am wrong. High numbers means poor, more delay.
>>
>>    Now, because we plan to support both: Reiser3 and Reiser4 in our OS,
>>    we plan to know if there are some system the Reiser3 performance
>>    may become available for Reiser4.
>>
>>    Reiser4 is superior but seems that with full security enabled logically
>>    the system may delay.
>>
>>    Basically, my question may be re-posted like: "I know Reiser4 is
>>    different than Reiser3, but may the Reiser4 performance may be superior
>>    all the time, doing some update?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Unfortunately, currently, reiser4 is not yet superior all the time.
>There are some bottlenecks we are trying to fix these days.
>
>  
>
OK! ... However this is problem for us.

Until now, I don't look yet around in Reiser4 code, because too busy.

However my previous comment: "Use Reiser3 code where is better" ... may 
work.

I am sure that R4 is too different but logically may work!

Thanks,
Giovanni.


-- 
-- 

Check FT Websites ... http://www.futuretg.com  - ftp://ftp.futuretg.com
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com
    http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com/Certification
http://www.RPMParadaise.org
http://www.GiovanniOrlando.com


Fixed Europe:  +39 0824 314 007.
Global Mobile: +39 393 665 4239  (does not work if I am in Caracas).
Global Venezuelan Mobile: +58 412 55 41 338.


--