From: "Giovanni A. Orlando" <gorlando@futuretg.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: A question: May Reiser4 be equivalent to Reiser3 with some flag/plugin ...
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:28:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43CDFC25.90401@futuretg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601092001.17684.marcel@hilzinger.hu>
Hi,
Looking the http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz article, I
see that
in some cases ReiserFS 3.X is better than Reiser4.
Correct me if I am wrong. High numbers means poor, more delay.
Now, because we plan to support both: Reiser3 and Reiser4 in our OS,
we plan to know if there are some system the Reiser3 performance
may become available for Reiser4.
Reiser4 is superior but seems that with full security enabled logically
the system may delay.
Basically, my question may be re-posted like: "I know Reiser4 is
different than Reiser3, but may the Reiser4 performance may be superior
all the time, doing some update?
Thanks,
Giovanni.
--
--
Check FT Websites ... http://www.futuretg.com - ftp://ftp.futuretg.com
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com/Certification
http://www.RPMParadaise.org
http://www.GiovanniOrlando.com
Fixed Europe: +39 0824 314 007.
Global Mobile: +39 393 665 4239 (does not work if I am in Caracas).
Global Venezuelan Mobile: +58 412 55 41 338.
'Life is ethernal ... and full of sex!'
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 18:10 Linux Gazette benchmark Reiser 4 Robert Hulme
2006-01-06 19:09 ` PFC
2006-01-06 20:15 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-08 22:07 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-01-09 11:04 ` Re[2]: " Pysiak Satriani
2006-01-09 19:50 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-10 7:57 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-07 12:41 ` Andrea Gelmini
2006-01-07 14:03 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2006-01-09 18:22 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-09 19:01 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2006-01-18 8:28 ` Giovanni A. Orlando [this message]
2006-01-18 17:40 ` A question: May Reiser4 be equivalent to Reiser3 with some flag/plugin Hans Reiser
2006-01-18 18:43 ` Giovanni A. Orlando
2006-01-18 18:21 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2006-01-18 18:39 ` Giovanni A. Orlando
2006-01-18 20:17 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43CDFC25.90401@futuretg.com \
--to=gorlando@futuretg.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.