From: Jad Naous <jnaous@stanford.edu>
To: BSD Lazarus <BSD@BSDLazarus.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Custom Hardware Acceleration
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:32:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D94005.1090900@stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D937BD.1000309@BSDLazarus.com>
Yes, if I do end up doing it on an FPGA, it would be open-source.
However, I'm also open to suggestions that don't necessarily end up on a
separate (from the CPU) standalone ASIC/FPGA, but should be integrated
into the CPU.
For example, are there any processor instructions (extensions) Xen
developers would like to see in future processors? I'm doing research
into either including reprogrammable hardware into a CPU (research
oriented) or on a separate chip that is close to the CPU
(implementation), which could then be configured according to the
application running on it.
Returning to the example I mentioned, the instruction could then be
implemented on the FPGA so that Xen could use it. Any ideas similar to
this would also be very interesting. Of course, the instruction idea is
only limited to on-chip reprogrammable logic, but the concept for an
off-chip FPGA is similar, but limited in communication speed with the CPU.
Btw, sorry if this is not the appropriate place to post this. I'd be
happy to move it somewhere else if I'm asked to, but I thought that this
would be of interest to Xen developers.
Thanks,
Jad.
BSD Lazarus wrote:
> Hello Jad,
>
> Do you plan on an open-source FPGA design?
>
> -- David
>
> Jad Naous wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am exploring the possibility of designing a custom hardware
>> acceleration solution using an ASIC or an FPGA to accelerate some part
>> of Xen. Basically, I am looking for some part of the code that could
>> be built in hardware to make it faster. Does anybody know where I
>> could get some statistics on the code, such as the most called
>> functions, the most parallelizable functions, etc... If you could
>> think of something that would be useful in HW I would be very
>> interested to know.
>> Thanks,
>> Jad.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-26 8:52 Custom Hardware Acceleration Jad Naous
2006-01-26 20:48 ` Jon Mason
2006-01-30 20:41 ` Jad Naous
2006-01-30 22:48 ` Jon Mason
[not found] ` <43D937BD.1000309@BSDLazarus.com>
2006-01-26 21:32 ` Jad Naous [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-26 15:57 Petersson, Mats
2006-01-26 23:02 Ian Pratt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D94005.1090900@stanford.edu \
--to=jnaous@stanford.edu \
--cc=BSD@BSDLazarus.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.