From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Edward Shishkin <edward@namesys.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:14:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D9D681.7020002@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060127080625.GS4311@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the
>
>real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when
>you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture.
>
>
>
He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked
at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed
cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the
real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just
going to keep getting faster.
Best,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-27 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <43D7C6BE.1010804@namesys.com>
2006-01-25 18:59 ` random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress) Hans Reiser
2006-01-26 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-26 18:17 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-01-26 18:56 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-26 20:41 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-01-27 7:43 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-27 8:09 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-27 8:06 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-27 8:14 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-01-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-27 8:41 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-28 16:53 ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-01-27 7:30 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-26 17:46 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2006-01-26 18:41 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-02-17 19:12 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2006-02-20 13:11 ` Clemens Eisserer
2006-02-20 17:09 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D9D681.7020002@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Reiserfs-List@namesys.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=edward@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.