* HVM Tree merged (looks like)]
@ 2006-01-31 18:32 Nivedita Singhvi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nivedita Singhvi @ 2006-01-31 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
From the changelog, looks like the HVM tree is now fully
in xen-unstable, thanks! Ian, we're going to stop picking up
the HVM tree and shift our testing to xen-unstable.
More on the bugs front later today..
thanks,
Nivedita
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: HVM Tree merged (looks like)]
@ 2006-01-31 19:13 Nakajima, Jun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2006-01-31 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nivedita Singhvi, xen-devel
Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> From the changelog, looks like the HVM tree is now fully
> in xen-unstable, thanks! Ian, we're going to stop picking up
> the HVM tree and shift our testing to xen-unstable.
>
> More on the bugs front later today..
Yes, we are seeing problems here.
>
> thanks,
> Nivedita
>
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: HVM Tree merged (looks like)]
@ 2006-02-01 7:49 Nakajima, Jun
2006-02-01 15:47 ` Khoa Huynh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2006-02-01 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
It turned out those were just setup issues at our side. As far as we did
sanity tests, the VMX domains look fine. Thanks for the professional
job.
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
>> From the changelog, looks like the HVM tree is now fully
>> in xen-unstable, thanks! Ian, we're going to stop picking up
>> the HVM tree and shift our testing to xen-unstable.
>>
>> More on the bugs front later today..
>
> Yes, we are seeing problems here.
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Nivedita
>>
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: HVM Tree merged (looks like)]
2006-02-01 7:49 Nakajima, Jun
@ 2006-02-01 15:47 ` Khoa Huynh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Khoa Huynh @ 2006-02-01 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nakajima, Jun; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-devel-bounces
jun.nakajima@intel.com wrote on 02/01/2006 01:49:03 AM:
> It turned out those were just setup issues at our side. As far as we did
> sanity tests, the VMX domains look fine. Thanks for the professional
> job.
>
> Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> > Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> >> From the changelog, looks like the HVM tree is now fully
> >> in xen-unstable, thanks! Ian, we're going to stop picking up
> >> the HVM tree and shift our testing to xen-unstable.
> >>
> >> More on the bugs front later today..
> >
> > Yes, we are seeing problems here.
> >
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Nivedita
> >>
>
> Jun
> ---
Jun - glad to hear that the problems you saw turned out to be
setup problems on your end. Based on my (albeit limited) testing
so far, we did not encounter any problems that we did not see
prior to the hvm merge. We'll do more testing today, however.
Thanks.
Regards,
Khoa
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-01 15:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-31 18:32 HVM Tree merged (looks like)] Nivedita Singhvi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-31 19:13 Nakajima, Jun
2006-02-01 7:49 Nakajima, Jun
2006-02-01 15:47 ` Khoa Huynh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.