* Re: PPPoE stuff
2006-02-06 20:13 PPPoE stuff Ionut Turturica
@ 2006-02-06 20:27 ` James Carlson
2006-02-06 20:28 ` Bill Unruh
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Carlson @ 2006-02-06 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Ionut Turturica writes:
> Any hints for this?
> I'm trying to connect a XP machine with a rp-pppoe server. I see that XP
> client keeps requesting CallBack, and we refuse it..
The lack of response to your LCP Configure-Request messages (he should
have sent at least an ack or nak) seems to indicate that this is a
low-level communications problem of some sort. No packets are getting
through at all, so negotiation is simply impossible. PPP is running,
but the PPPoE mechanism is failing.
> Feb 6 22:06:42 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
> buffering packet 1003 (expecting 1000, lost or reordered)
[...]
> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppoe-server[31611]: Sent PADT
That's sort of scary. Is this PPTP, PPPoE, or what? Why messages
from both? (Or are those just unrelated?)
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj@workingcode.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: PPPoE stuff
2006-02-06 20:13 PPPoE stuff Ionut Turturica
2006-02-06 20:27 ` James Carlson
@ 2006-02-06 20:28 ` Bill Unruh
2006-02-06 20:36 ` Jar
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bill Unruh @ 2006-02-06 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Ionut Turturica wrote:
>
> Any hints for this?
> I'm trying to connect a XP machine with a rp-pppoe server. I see that XP
> client keeps requesting CallBack, and we refuse it..
The remote machine refuses to do anything. In fact there is no evidence it
is receiving your messages at all. It responds to nothing you send it.
Are you sure that the two machines can speak to each other?
>
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppoe-server[31771]: Session 2 created for client
> 00:11:2f:22:c0:7a (10.67.15.2) on br0 using Service-Name ''
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppd[31771]: pppd 2.4.4b1 started by root, uid 0
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppd[31771]: using channel 495
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppd[31771]: Using interface ppp1
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppd[31771]: Connect: ppp1 <--> /dev/pts/11
> Feb 6 22:06:23 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:26 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:27 lfs pppd[31771]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1480> <magic
> 0x4c9160fa> <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:27 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:29 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:32 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:35 lfs pppd[31771]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <mru 1480> <magic
> 0x4c9160fa> <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:35 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x4 <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:35 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:41 lfs last message repeated 2 times
> Feb 6 22:06:42 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
> buffering packet 1003 (expecting 1000, lost or reordered)
> Feb 6 22:06:43 lfs pppd[31771]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 <mru 1480> <magic
> 0x4c9160fa> <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:43 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x6 <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:44 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:46 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
> buffering packet 1012 (expecting 1011, lost or reordered)
> Feb 6 22:06:47 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:50 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth pap> <magic
> 0x3d25fa22>]
> Feb 6 22:06:51 lfs pppd[31771]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x8 <mru 1480> <magic
> 0x4c9160fa> <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:51 lfs pppd[31771]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x8 <callback CBCP>]
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: Connection terminated.
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: Modem hangup
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: Waiting for 1 child processes...
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: script /usr/sbin/pppoe -n -I br0 -e
> 2:00:11:2f:22:c0:7a -S '', pid 31772
> Feb 6 22:06:57 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
> buffering packet 1075 (expecting 1074, lost or reordered)
> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppd[31771]: sending SIGTERM to process 31772
> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppd[31771]: Exit.
> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppoe-server[31611]: Session 2 closed for client
> 00:11:2f:22:c0:7a (10.67.15.2) on br0
> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppoe-server[31611]: Sent PADT
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
William G. Unruh | Canadian Institute for| Tel: +1(604)822-3273
Physics&Astronomy | Advanced Research | Fax: +1(604)822-5324
UBC, Vancouver,BC | Program in Cosmology | unruh@physics.ubc.ca
Canada V6T 1Z1 | and Gravity | www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: PPPoE stuff
2006-02-06 20:13 PPPoE stuff Ionut Turturica
2006-02-06 20:27 ` James Carlson
2006-02-06 20:28 ` Bill Unruh
@ 2006-02-06 20:36 ` Jar
2006-02-06 20:52 ` Ionut Turturica
2006-02-06 21:01 ` Ionut Turturica
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jar @ 2006-02-06 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Ionut Turturica wrote:
> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppoe-server[31771]: Session 2 created for client
> 00:11:2f:22:c0:7a (10.67.15.2) on br0 using Service-Name ''
> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: script /usr/sbin/pppoe -n -I br0 -e
> 2:00:11:2f:22:c0:7a -S '', pid 31772
Why you run pppoe over bridge interface br0? Is that going to work?
Which bridge port it is going to use? Usually pppoe is running over
ethernet device, it doesn't need ip interface. Interface can have an ip,
but pppoe doesn't use it.
--
Best Regards, Jar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPPoE stuff
2006-02-06 20:13 PPPoE stuff Ionut Turturica
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-06 20:36 ` Jar
@ 2006-02-06 20:52 ` Ionut Turturica
2006-02-06 21:01 ` Ionut Turturica
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ionut Turturica @ 2006-02-06 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
I bridged a tap device + eth0 and resulted br0, I see no problem with
this. PPPoE does the initial handshake and starts a new session then
passes to pppd which fails..
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:36:45 +0200, Jar <jar@pcuf.fi> wrote:
> Ionut Turturica wrote:
>
>> Feb 6 22:06:22 lfs pppoe-server[31771]: Session 2 created for client
>> 00:11:2f:22:c0:7a (10.67.15.2) on br0 using Service-Name ''
>> Feb 6 22:06:53 lfs pppd[31771]: script /usr/sbin/pppoe -n -I br0 -e
>> 2:00:11:2f:22:c0:7a -S '', pid 31772
>
> Why you run pppoe over bridge interface br0? Is that going to work?
> Which bridge port it is going to use? Usually pppoe is running over
> ethernet device, it doesn't need ip interface. Interface can have an ip,
> but pppoe doesn't use it.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: PPPoE stuff
2006-02-06 20:13 PPPoE stuff Ionut Turturica
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-06 20:52 ` Ionut Turturica
@ 2006-02-06 21:01 ` Ionut Turturica
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ionut Turturica @ 2006-02-06 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ppp
Indeed, the XP machine doesn't receive any ppp packet as if anything
that's written to that pty is lost :/
PS: ignore that pptp messages..I used same log file for both pptp and
pppoe.
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:27:20 +0200, James Carlson
<carlsonj@workingcode.com> wrote:
> Ionut Turturica writes:
>> Any hints for this?
>> I'm trying to connect a XP machine with a rp-pppoe server. I see that XP
>> client keeps requesting CallBack, and we refuse it..
>
> The lack of response to your LCP Configure-Request messages (he should
> have sent at least an ack or nak) seems to indicate that this is a
> low-level communications problem of some sort. No packets are getting
> through at all, so negotiation is simply impossible. PPP is running,
> but the PPPoE mechanism is failing.
>
>> Feb 6 22:06:42 lfs pptp[31703]: anon log[decaps_gre:pptp_gre.c:407]:
>> buffering packet 1003 (expecting 1000, lost or reordered)
> [...]
>> Feb 6 22:06:58 lfs pppoe-server[31611]: Sent PADT
>
> That's sort of scary. Is this PPTP, PPPoE, or what? Why messages
> from both? (Or are those just unrelated?)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread