All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:24:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4405CADA.3070204@h3c.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301124432.GA3591@hactar.lan>


Why would you not be happy? resyncs in general are bad since they
indicate your data is possibly out-of-sync and the resync itself
consumes an enormous amount of resources

This is a feature of new-ish md driver code that more aggressively marks
the array as "clean" after writes

The end result is that the array will most likely be "clean" in all
circumstances even a crash, and you simply won't need to resync

That's a good thing!

-Mike

Kasper Dupont wrote:
> I have a FC4 installation (upgraded from FC3) using kernel
> version 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4. I see some symptoms in the software
> raid, which I'm not quite happy about.
> 
> After an unclean shutdown caused by a crash or power failure,
> it does not resync the md devices. I have tried comparing the
> contents of the two mirrors for each of the md devices. And I
> found that on the swap device, there were differences.
> 
> Isn't this a bug in the software raid? Shouldn't it always
> resync after reboot, if there could possibly be any difference
> between the contents on the two disks?
> 
> I know that as long as only swap is affected, it is not going
> to cause data loss. But how can I be sure it is not going to
> happen on file systems as well?
> 
> Should I report this as a bug in Fedora Core or did I miss
> something?
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-01 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-01 12:44 No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug? Kasper Dupont
2006-03-01 13:58 ` Luca Berra
2006-03-01 16:24 ` Mike Hardy [this message]
2006-03-01 21:56 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-02 13:48   ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 13:39     ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 14:30       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 22:26         ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-03 23:01           ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04  9:01             ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-04 10:10               ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03  7:30   ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 12:03     ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 12:38       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-03 14:48     ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-03 15:10       ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 13:16       ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-04 13:38         ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2006-03-04 19:50         ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 10:47         ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-07 11:18           ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-07 12:12             ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10  7:43             ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-03-10  7:49               ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16  7:24                 ` Kasper Dupont
2006-03-16 14:04                   ` Heinz Mauelshagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4405CADA.3070204@h3c.com \
    --to=mhardy@h3c.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.