From: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] gpio/at91: free GPIO after configuring as input
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:45:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4406073.7Z2odFudGD@kongar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A08D29A3-2690-46C1-A317-41B17F365A81@jcrosoft.com>
I'm CC'ing some input guys if this can't be solved in the pinctrl/irq side.
On Friday 11 April 2014, 23:30:33 wrote Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
>
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > If the GPIO stays requested a device driver can't request it again.
> > e.g. Without this patch the ads7846 driver returns the following error:
> > ads7846 spi32766.3: failed to request/setup pendown GPIO15: -16
> > ads7846: probe of spi32766.3 failed with error -16
> >
> > /sys/kernel/debug/gpio shows this:
> > GPIOs 0-31, platform/fffff200.gpio, fffff200.gpio:
> > [/ahb/apb/pinctrl@fffff200/gpio@fffff200] GPIOfffff200.gpio15: [gpio] set
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
> > ---
> > I'm aware that it makes sense this GPIO is/stays requested, but either the
> > pinctl or device driver have to be adjusted as both can't request this GPIO.
> > I think the latter shouldn't change.
> >
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > index d990e33..63176f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > @@ -1493,6 +1493,8 @@ static int at91_gpio_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + gpio_free(pin);
> > +
>
> NACK it the whole key point the gpio use as a IRQ so the irq generic code request it
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alexanders83@web.de (Alexander Stein)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio/at91: free GPIO after configuring as input
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:45:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4406073.7Z2odFudGD@kongar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A08D29A3-2690-46C1-A317-41B17F365A81@jcrosoft.com>
I'm CC'ing some input guys if this can't be solved in the pinctrl/irq side.
On Friday 11 April 2014, 23:30:33 wrote Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
>
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > If the GPIO stays requested a device driver can't request it again.
> > e.g. Without this patch the ads7846 driver returns the following error:
> > ads7846 spi32766.3: failed to request/setup pendown GPIO15: -16
> > ads7846: probe of spi32766.3 failed with error -16
> >
> > /sys/kernel/debug/gpio shows this:
> > GPIOs 0-31, platform/fffff200.gpio, fffff200.gpio:
> > [/ahb/apb/pinctrl at fffff200/gpio at fffff200] GPIOfffff200.gpio15: [gpio] set
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
> > ---
> > I'm aware that it makes sense this GPIO is/stays requested, but either the
> > pinctl or device driver have to be adjusted as both can't request this GPIO.
> > I think the latter shouldn't change.
> >
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > index d990e33..63176f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > @@ -1493,6 +1493,8 @@ static int at91_gpio_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + gpio_free(pin);
> > +
>
> NACK it the whole key point the gpio use as a IRQ so the irq generic code request it
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 14:24 [PATCH] gpio/at91: free GPIO after configuring as input Alexander Stein
2014-04-11 15:30 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-04-11 15:45 ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2014-04-11 15:45 ` Alexander Stein
2014-04-11 17:28 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-04-11 17:28 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-04-12 22:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-04-12 22:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4406073.7Z2odFudGD@kongar \
--to=alexanders83@web.de \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.