Re: Coding Standards

["Giovanni A. Orlando" <gorlando@futuretg.com>]

>>Hello,
>>
>>I was reading an article long ago where Mr Reiser was saying that he
>>was using military grade coding standards. And that it is also the
>>reason why Reiser4 is not integrated by default in the Linux kernel.
>>    
>>
>
>I think that was a minor issue.  The major issues are political.
>
>  
>
So ... what the hell happens? Why is not included yet?

Thanks,
Giovanni.

>>My experience at looking at GNU code is that it is sloppy and I want
>>to start a high-assurance project with the best of the best of coding
>>practices... something making me feel that the GNU coding guidelines
>>are not the best of options.
>>    
>>
>
>I would really look into the various security and secure coding papers
>and articles that have been funded by DARPA and others over the years. 
>Pick through them, read them, and code that way.  The guys writing the
>articles are much more expert than I am on it.
>
>  
>
>>Your input would be very appreciated!
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>


-- 

--
--
http://www.FutureTG.com      - The Main Website.
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com - The Website for Linux Training.
http://www.RPMParadaise.com  - The Website for RPM Packages.

Phone: +58 412 55 41 338 (I am in Caracas, actually)

FT Addresses are located at: http://www.futuretg.com/FT/contact.html