Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board.

["Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>]

Hi Markus,

Am Freitag, 8. November 2019, 16:18:39 CET schrieb Markus Reichl:
> Am 08.11.19 um 15:41 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> > Am Montag, 4. November 2019, 16:22:25 CET schrieb Markus Reichl:
> >> For rk3399-roc-pc is a mezzanine board available that carries M.2 and
> >> POE interfaces. Use it with a separate dts.
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> v3: Use enum in binding and full name in compatible string and file name.
> >> v2: Add new compatible string for roc-pc with mezzanine board.
> >> --
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>
> >> ---
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   4 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >>  .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts  |  72 ++
> >>  .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts | 757 +----------------
> >>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi      | 770 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>  5 files changed, 847 insertions(+), 757 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts
> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
> >> 
> > 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts
> >> index 7e07dae33d0f..cd4195425309 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts
> >> @@ -4,764 +4,9 @@
> > 
> > This whole hunk fails to apply against my current branch for 5.5
> > which contain your other patches [0].
> > 
> > And the moved block is obviously so big that I can't really check
> > which part is somehow different, so I'd ask you to rebase this
> > patch accordingly, so that it applies again.
> 
> Yes, will rebase and come with v4.

Not wanting to put any pressure on you, but do you have an estimate
for this? I need to do my second (and final) round of pull requests for
v5.5, so it would of course be interesting if it's sensible to wait for
your respin ;-)

Thanks
Heiko