From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442D7790.2010300@wolfmountaingroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com>
Linas Vepstas wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:14:56PM -0700, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, we need one. The adapter needs to maintain these stats from the
>>registers in the kernel structure and not
>>its own local variables.
>>
>>
>
>Did you read the code to see what the adapter does with these stats?
>Among other things, it uses them to adaptively modulate transmit rates
>to avoid collisions. Just clearing the hardware-private stats will mess
>up that function.
>
>
>
I noticed that.
>>That way, when someone calls to clear the stats
>>for testing and analysis purposes,
>>they zero out and are reset.
>>
>>
>
>1) ifdown/ifup is guarenteed to to clear things. Try that.
>
>
No, not dynamic. I'll patch the driver locally, thanks.
Jeff
>2) What's wrong with taking deltas? Typical through-put performance
>measurement is done by pre-loading the pipes (i.e. running for
>a few minutes wihtout measuring, then starting the measurement).
>I'd think that snapshotting the numbers would be easier, and is
>trivially doable in user-space. I guess I don't understand why
>you need a new kernel featre to imlement this.
>
>--linas
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: john.ronciak@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442D7790.2010300@wolfmountaingroup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com>
Linas Vepstas wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:14:56PM -0700, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, we need one. The adapter needs to maintain these stats from the
>>registers in the kernel structure and not
>>its own local variables.
>>
>>
>
>Did you read the code to see what the adapter does with these stats?
>Among other things, it uses them to adaptively modulate transmit rates
>to avoid collisions. Just clearing the hardware-private stats will mess
>up that function.
>
>
>
I noticed that.
>>That way, when someone calls to clear the stats
>>for testing and analysis purposes,
>>they zero out and are reset.
>>
>>
>
>1) ifdown/ifup is guarenteed to to clear things. Try that.
>
>
No, not dynamic. I'll patch the driver locally, thanks.
Jeff
>2) What's wrong with taking deltas? Typical through-put performance
>measurement is done by pre-loading the pipes (i.e. running for
>a few minutes wihtout measuring, then starting the measurement).
>I'd think that snapshotting the numbers would be easier, and is
>trivially doable in user-space. I guess I don't understand why
>you need a new kernel featre to imlement this.
>
>--linas
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-30 21:39 [PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset Linas Vepstas
2006-03-30 21:39 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 0:02 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 0:02 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 1:05 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-03-31 1:05 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-03-31 0:35 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 0:35 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 4:14 ` Jeffrey V. Merkey
2006-03-31 4:14 ` Jeffrey V. Merkey
2006-03-31 17:03 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 17:03 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 17:36 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-31 17:36 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-31 18:40 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2006-03-31 18:40 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-03-31 5:46 ` Greg KH
2006-03-31 5:46 ` Greg KH
2006-03-31 17:06 ` Linas Vepstas
2006-03-31 17:06 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442D7790.2010300@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--to=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.