slow susped to disk

slow susped to disk

[Zaher Salman]

Hi,

I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16 on my presario 2100. Both 
kernels were compiled with the similar configuration files. Anyway I 
found that suspend to disk (and resume) is much slower on 2.6.16 
compared to 2.6.15. Any idea for why that might happen or how can I 
speed it up? There is also a big difference when suspending with the 
laptop plugged or not..

thanks
Zaher

-- 
Zaher Salman

TRIUMF
4004 Wesbrook Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 2A3

Email: zaher@triumf.ca
Tel.: + 1 604 222 1047 ext. 6588
Fax:  + 1 604 222 1074 

Re: slow susped to disk

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Monday 03 April 2006 11:00, Zaher Salman wrote:
> I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16 on my presario 2100. Both 
> kernels were compiled with the similar configuration files. Anyway I 
> found that suspend to disk (and resume) is much slower on 2.6.16 
> compared to 2.6.15. Any idea for why that might happen or how can I 
> speed it up? There is also a big difference when suspending with the 
> laptop plugged or not..

This is because the size of the suspend image is now greater than
for 2.6.15.

There's the /sys/power/image_size knob that controls the size of the image.
If you set it to 0 (eg. by echo 0 > /sys/power/image_size as root), the
2.6.15 behavior should be restored.  However, if you set image_size > 0
it should improve the system responsiveness after resume.

Please refer to Documentation/power/interface.txt in the kernel tree for
details.

Greetings,
Rafael

Re: slow susped to disk

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16 on my presario 2100. Both 
> > kernels were compiled with the similar configuration files. Anyway I 
> > found that suspend to disk (and resume) is much slower on 2.6.16 
> > compared to 2.6.15. Any idea for why that might happen or how can I 
> > speed it up? There is also a big difference when suspending with the 
> > laptop plugged or not..
> 
> This is because the size of the suspend image is now greater than
> for 2.6.15.
> 
> There's the /sys/power/image_size knob that controls the size of the image.
> If you set it to 0 (eg. by echo 0 > /sys/power/image_size as root), the
> 2.6.15 behavior should be restored.  However, if you set image_size > 0
> it should improve the system responsiveness after resume.
> 
> Please refer to Documentation/power/interface.txt in the kernel tree for
> details.

If you don't mind, I have added it to the FAQ.

diff --git a/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt b/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
index 55e0006..3fcec52 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
@@ -396,4 +396,17 @@ mounted filesystem.  With USB that's tru
 The safest thing is to unmount all USB-based filesystems before suspending
 and remount them after resuming.
 
-
+Q: I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16. Both kernels were
+compiled with the similar configuration files. Anyway I found that
+suspend to disk (and resume) is much slower on 2.6.16 compared to
+2.6.15. Any idea for why that might happen or how can I speed it up?
+
+A: This is because the size of the suspend image is now greater than
+for 2.6.15 (by saving more data we can get more responsive system
+after resume).
+
+There's the /sys/power/image_size knob that controls the size of the
+image.  If you set it to 0 (eg. by echo 0 > /sys/power/image_size as
+root), the 2.6.15 behavior should be restored.  If it is still too
+slow, take a look at suspend.sf.net -- userland suspend is faster and
+supports LZF compression to speed it up further.


-- 
Picture of sleeping (Linux) penguin wanted...

Re: slow susped to disk

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi,

On Monday 03 April 2006 11:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16 on my presario 2100. Both 
> > > kernels were compiled with the similar configuration files. Anyway I 
> > > found that suspend to disk (and resume) is much slower on 2.6.16 
> > > compared to 2.6.15. Any idea for why that might happen or how can I 
> > > speed it up? There is also a big difference when suspending with the 
> > > laptop plugged or not..
> > 
> > This is because the size of the suspend image is now greater than
> > for 2.6.15.
> > 
> > There's the /sys/power/image_size knob that controls the size of the image.
> > If you set it to 0 (eg. by echo 0 > /sys/power/image_size as root), the
> > 2.6.15 behavior should be restored.  However, if you set image_size > 0
> > it should improve the system responsiveness after resume.
> > 
> > Please refer to Documentation/power/interface.txt in the kernel tree for
> > details.
> 
> If you don't mind, I have added it to the FAQ.

ACK

Rafael