From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mm: An enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:20:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4434C12A.4000108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060406094533.b340f633.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Kamezawa-san,
Thank you for your comments.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hi, AOKI-san
>
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:47:27 -0400
> Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hello Andrew,
>>
>>Could you apply my patches to your tree?
>>
>>These patches are an enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS algorithm in
>>__vm_enough_memory(). The detailed description is in attached patch.
>
> I think adding a function like this is more simple way.
> (call this istead of nr_free_pages().)
> ==
> int nr_available_memory()
> {
> unsigned long sum = 0;
> for_each_zone(zone) {
> if (zone->free_pages > zone->pages_high)
> sum += zone->free_pages - zone->pages_high;
> }
> return sum;
> }
> ==
I like your idea. But, in the function, I think we need to care
lowmem_reserve too.
Since __vm_enough_memory() doesn't know zone and cpuset information,
we have to guess proper value of lowmem_reserve in each zone
like I did in calculate_totalreserve_pages() in my patch.
Do you think that we can do this calculation every time?
If it is good enough, I'll make revised patch.
> BTW, vm_enough_memory() doesn't eat cpuset information ?
I think this is another point which we should improve.
Best regards,
Hideo Aoki
---
Hideo Aoki, Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mm: An enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:20:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4434C12A.4000108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060406094533.b340f633.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Kamezawa-san,
Thank you for your comments.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hi, AOKI-san
>
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:47:27 -0400
> Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hello Andrew,
>>
>>Could you apply my patches to your tree?
>>
>>These patches are an enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS algorithm in
>>__vm_enough_memory(). The detailed description is in attached patch.
>
> I think adding a function like this is more simple way.
> (call this istead of nr_free_pages().)
> ==
> int nr_available_memory()
> {
> unsigned long sum = 0;
> for_each_zone(zone) {
> if (zone->free_pages > zone->pages_high)
> sum += zone->free_pages - zone->pages_high;
> }
> return sum;
> }
> ==
I like your idea. But, in the function, I think we need to care
lowmem_reserve too.
Since __vm_enough_memory() doesn't know zone and cpuset information,
we have to guess proper value of lowmem_reserve in each zone
like I did in calculate_totalreserve_pages() in my patch.
Do you think that we can do this calculation every time?
If it is good enough, I'll make revised patch.
> BTW, vm_enough_memory() doesn't eat cpuset information ?
I think this is another point which we should improve.
Best regards,
Hideo Aoki
---
Hideo Aoki, Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-06 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-05 23:47 [patch 1/3] mm: An enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS Hideo AOKI
2006-04-05 23:51 ` A test kernel module " Hideo AOKI
2006-04-05 23:52 ` A patch for test_overcommit module Hideo AOKI
2006-04-06 0:45 ` [patch 1/3] mm: An enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-06 0:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-06 7:20 ` Hideo AOKI [this message]
2006-04-06 7:20 ` Hideo AOKI
2006-04-06 8:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-06 8:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-07 11:49 ` Hideo AOKI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4434C12A.4000108@redhat.com \
--to=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.