RE: RE: Failed resuming IDE from S3 on Abit NF7 (nForce2)

RE: RE: Failed resuming IDE from S3 on Abit NF7 (nForce2)

[Andreas Saur]

    Dear Luming,

the bug you are refering to, seems pretty much the same bug like I do 
have here. But I've got two questions. Could you please help me? And I 
do asume, that this patch isn't in the resent kernel yet, isn't it?

1) If I want to adopt your patch, I should use the values from my 
acpidump, but I can't find anything reasonable. What should my values 
look like? (see here: 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7762&action=view )

2) How do I ensure, that this native IDE driver is really used? Do I 
have to uncheck all non-native IDE drivers in the kernel config? (In my 
case it's the amd71xx, I guess)

Please excuse the silly questions, but I am pretty new to game of kernel 
configuration and compilation, but steady learning :-)

Thank you very much.

Refering to:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >>Bugzilla:
 >>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5604#c19ide_sleep.dpatch
 >>
 >>Patch:
 >>   http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/tmp/external-drivers-ide_sleep.dpatch
 >>
 >>------- Additional Comment #17 From Luming Yu  2005-11-18 07:49 -------
 >>
 >>The ide patch mentioned in comment#16 is not complete yet.
 >>That is the reason for ACPI HANDLE IS NULL.
 >>
 >>So, It's not surprise it doesn't work.
 >>Could you try to remove error detecting code before invoking _GTM and 
_STM
 >>And hardcode with :
 >>
 >>For invoking _GTM:
 >>
 >>{
 >>acpi_handle tmp;
 >>acpi_get_handle(NULL, \\_SB.C002.C0A6.C1D5, &tmp);
 >>status = acpi_evaluate_object(tmp, "_GTM", NULL, &buffer);
 >>...
 >>}
 >>
 >>For invoking _STM:
 >>
 >>{
 >>acpi_handle tmp;
 >>acpi_get_handle(NULL, \\_SB.C002.C0A6.C1D5, &tmp);
 >>status = acpi_evaluate_object(stat->handle, "_STM", &input, NULL);
 >>..
 >>}
----------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: RE: Failed resuming IDE from S3 on Abit NF7 (nForce2)

[Yu, Luming]

>the bug you are refering to, seems pretty much the same bug like I do 
>have here. But I've got two questions. Could you please help me? And I 
>do asume, that this patch isn't in the resent kernel yet, isn't it?

I didn't check it, Probably Not.

>
>1) If I want to adopt your patch, I should use the values from my 
>acpidump, but I can't find anything reasonable. What should my values 
>look like? (see here: 
>http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7762&action=view )
>
\\_SB.PCI0.IDE0.PRI0  (It's zero)
\\_SB.PCI0.IDE0.SEC0 (It's zero)


>2) How do I ensure, that this native IDE driver is really used? Do I 
>have to uncheck all non-native IDE drivers in the kernel 
>config? (In my 
>case it's the amd71xx, I guess)
>

You can try only CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC.


>Please excuse the silly questions, but I am pretty new to game 
>of kernel 
>configuration and compilation, but steady learning :-)

happy hacking. :-)

--Luming