* [LARTC] any alternative to netem drop? slow
@ 2006-04-21 4:54 George Nychis
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: George Nychis @ 2006-04-21 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any alternative to netem drop probability...
the reason I ask is that whenever I turn it on I get about 500KB/sec
less throughput with 0% packet loss
The caveat is that it must work with 2.4.32 :)
Thanks!
George
Jason Boxman wrote:
>On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:19, Francisco wrote:
>
>
>>L7 filter works very well too:
>>http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
>>
>>Although I didn't try it with sip, I use it to control my P2P and server
>>applications and have a very usable ADSL link at almost 100% utilization of
>>my upstream.
>>
>>
>
>Does any of that include eMule traffic? I stopped having success with eMule
>protocols and L7 a year or two ago and the pattern hasn't been updated in
>ages.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-04-21 4:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-21 4:54 [LARTC] any alternative to netem drop? slow George Nychis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.