From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] Re: [lockup] 2.6.17-rc3: netfilter/sctp: lockup in sctp_new(), do_basic_checks()
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:54:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4457648C.6020100@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060502134053.GA30917@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thinking about it, what prevents the SCTP chunk's len field from being
> zero, and thus causing an infinite loop in for_each_sctp_chunk()? The
> patch below should fix that.
>
> Ingo
>
> ----
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> fix infinite loop in the SCTP-netfilter code: check SCTP chunk size to
> guarantee progress of for_each_sctp_chunk(). (all other uses of
> for_each_sctp_chunk() are preceded by do_basic_checks(), so this fix
> should be complete.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Index: linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,15 @@ static int do_basic_checks(struct ip_con
> flag = 0;
>
> for_each_sctp_chunk (skb, sch, _sch, offset, count) {
> + unsigned int len = (htons(sch->length) + 3) & ~3;
> +
> + /*
> + * Dont get into a loop with zero-sized or negative
> + * length values:
> + */
> + if (!len || len >= skb->len)
> + goto fail;
> +
I just came up with a similar fix :) I think I'm going to take
my own patch though because its IMO slightly nicer. Thanks anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-02 11:34 [lockup] 2.6.17-rc3: netfilter/sctp: lockup in sctp_new(), do_basic_checks() Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:54 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-05-02 14:01 ` [netfilter-core] " Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 13:45 ` [netfilter-core] " Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 15:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-05-02 15:55 ` [netfilter-core] " Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4457648C.6020100@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.