Re: [PATCH] fc transport: correct default value for fc_dev_loss_tmo

[James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>]

NACK.

The real problem is in the define for SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT.
If you look at every use within the fc transport, including the set
function and when it actually sets the timeout, it expects dev_loss_tmo
to be in units of seconds. Thus, SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT should have
been the same thing.

I'll update my patch shortly.

-- james s

Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> In current kernels initialization of fc_dev_loss_tmo is wrong.
> See fc_remote_port_delete():
> 
>     int timeout = rport->dev_loss_tmo;
> ...
>     fc_queue_devloss_work(shost, &rport->dev_loss_work, timeout * HZ);
> 
> So actually a timeout of ((HZ*60)*HZ) is used or with James S's recent
> patch we have a timeout of ((HZ*120)*HZ). I think this was not
> intentional, so I suggest the following patch to correct this.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
> fc transport: correct default value for fc_dev_loss_tmo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com>
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 95c5478..a1cb05e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(fc_rport_
>   *   should insulate the loss of a remote port.
>   *   The maximum will be capped by the value of SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT.
>   */
> -static unsigned int fc_dev_loss_tmo = SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT;
> +static unsigned int fc_dev_loss_tmo = SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT / HZ;
>  
>  module_param_named(dev_loss_tmo, fc_dev_loss_tmo, int, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(dev_loss_tmo,
>