All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: rohitseth@google.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:27:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <448E3EA8.3020807@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606130551.23825.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:

>On Monday 12 June 2006 21:42, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
>>I think having this 
>>information in each vma keeps the impact (of adding new counter) to very
>>low.
>>
>>Second question is to advertize this value to user space.  Please let me
>>know what suites the most among /proc, /sys or system call (or if there
>>is any other mechanism then let me know) for a per process per segment
>>related information.
>>
>
>I think we first need to identify the basic need.
>Don't see why we even need per VMA information so far.
>

Exactly. There is no question that walking page tables will be slower
than having a counter like your patch does; the question is why we
need it.

--

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: rohitseth@google.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:27:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <448E3EA8.3020807@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606130551.23825.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:

>On Monday 12 June 2006 21:42, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
>>I think having this 
>>information in each vma keeps the impact (of adding new counter) to very
>>low.
>>
>>Second question is to advertize this value to user space.  Please let me
>>know what suites the most among /proc, /sys or system call (or if there
>>is any other mechanism then let me know) for a per process per segment
>>related information.
>>
>
>I think we first need to identify the basic need.
>Don't see why we even need per VMA information so far.
>

Exactly. There is no question that walking page tables will be slower
than having a counter like your patch does; the question is why we
need it.

--

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-13  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-10  1:33 [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it Rohit Seth
2006-06-10  1:33 ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-10  2:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-10  2:42   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-12 17:49   ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-12 17:49     ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-10  7:35 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-10  7:35   ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-11 10:15   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-11 10:15     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-12 17:36   ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-12 17:36     ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-12 17:58     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 17:58       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 19:42       ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-12 19:42         ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13  3:51         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13  3:51           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13  4:27           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-06-13  4:27             ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-13 16:59           ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 16:59             ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 17:28             ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-13 17:28               ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-13 18:09               ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 18:09                 ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 17:31             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13 17:31               ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-11 16:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-11 16:09   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-12 11:17   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 11:17     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 12:49     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-12 12:49       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-12 12:54       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 12:54         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-12 16:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-12 16:43   ` Christoph Lameter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-13  5:53 [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical_pages_backing it Albert Cahalan
2006-06-13  5:53 ` Albert Cahalan
2006-06-13  5:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13  5:56   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13 17:10   ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 17:10     ` Rohit Seth
2006-06-13 17:18     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-13 17:18       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=448E3EA8.3020807@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=Linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=rohitseth@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.