All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers:  Add support for per-task watchers
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:28:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44978793.8070109@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150242901.21787.149.camel@stark>

Matt Helsley wrote:
> This introduces a second, per-task, blocking notifier chain. The per-task
> chain offers watchers the chance to register with a specific task nstead of
> all tasks. It also allows the watcher to associate a block of data with the task
> by wrapping the notifier block using containerof().
> 
> Both the global, all-tasks chain and the per-task chain are called from the samefunction. The two types of chains share the same set of notification
> values, however registration functions and the registered notifier blocks must
> be separate.
> 
> These notifiers are only safe if notifier blocks are registered with the current
> task while in the context of the current task. This ensures that there are no
> races between registration, unregistration, and notification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
> Cc: Chandra S. Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
[bits deleted]

> Index: linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/kernel/sys.c
> +++ linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -450,13 +450,41 @@ int unregister_task_watcher(struct notif
>  	return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&task_watchers, nb);
>  }
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_task_watcher);
>  
> +static inline int notify_per_task_watchers(unsigned int val,
> +					   struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	if (get_watch_event(val) != WATCH_TASK_INIT)
> +		return raw_notifier_call_chain(&task->notify, val, task);
> +	RAW_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&task->notify);
> +	if (task->real_parent)
> +		return raw_notifier_call_chain(&task->real_parent->notify,
> +		   			       val, task);
> +}

It's possible for this task to exit without returning a result.

Peter
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-20  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060613235122.130021000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-06-13 23:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] Task watchers: Task Watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:19   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:55     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] Task watchers: Register process events task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:39   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] Task watchers: Refactor process events Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:43   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:11     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  8:09       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] Task watchers: Make process events configurable as a module Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:54   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:18     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] Task watchers: Allow task watchers to block Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] Task watchers: Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54   ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14 14:46   ` Alexander Viro
2006-06-14 14:46     ` Alexander Viro
2006-06-14 23:28     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14 23:28       ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] Task watchers: Register per-task delay accounting " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  3:31   ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-14 22:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] Task watchers: Register profile as a " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:59   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:16     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-20  5:28   ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-06-20 22:56     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:15       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 23:23         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  1:20         ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-21  1:46           ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21  1:55             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:01               ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:23                 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  2:28             ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:21       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] Task watchers: Register semundo task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] Task watchers: Register per-task semundo watcher Matt Helsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44978793.8070109@bigpond.net.au \
    --to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.