From: Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
balbir@in.ibm.com, csturtiv@sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:19:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449C30C1.6090802@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <449C2181.6000007@watson.ibm.com>
Shailabh Nagar wrote:
>Hi Andrew,
>
>Two developments on the tgid overhead issue:
>
>1. The latest results show that overhead is significant
>only when the exit rate exceeds roughly 1000 threads/second.
>
I worked with Shailabh this week to run various testing and
debugging as he requested. I was pulled off to some urgent
task yesterday and surprising saw this coming this morning...
Let's slow it down please. My last testing (after your fix in
#2 below) still showed 109% overhead at system time. And, the
per-thread group processing also increase the rate of ENOBUFS
at the receiver.
I need to check with other guys to find out if 1000 threads/sec
indeed unrealistic at our customers' environments. A good
design should allow a mechanism to turn off the penalty due to
a feature that is not common to everybody. I do not understand
your objection.
Regards,
- jay
>2. A new patch that modifies the locking used within taskstats,
>brings down the overhead of the extreme case quite a bit.
>I'll submit the patch along shortly in a separate mail.
>
>To get back to the effect of exit rate, I modified the fork+exit
>benchmark to vary the rate at which exits happened and
>ran tests on a 4-way 1.4 GHz x86_64 box. The kernel was 2.6.17,
>uses the delay accounting/taskstat patches in 2.6.17-mm1 + the new
>locking patch mentioned in 2. above.
>
>The results show that differential between tgid on and off
>starts becoming significant once the exit rate crosses roughly 1000
>threads/second. Below that exit rate, the difference is negligible.
>Above it, the difference starts climbing rapidly.
>
>So I guess the question is whether this rate of exit is representative
>enough of real life to warrant making any more changes to the existing
>patchset, beyond the locking changes in 2. above.
>
>>From my limited experience, I think this is too high an exit rate
>to be worrying about overhead.
>
>
> %ovhd of tgid on over off
> (higher is worse)
>
>Exit User Sys Elapsed
>Rate Time Time Time
>
>2283 25.76 649.41 -0.14
>1193 -10.53 88.81 -0.12
>963 -11.90 3.28 -0.10
>806 -8.54 -0.84 0.16
>694 -4.41 2.38 0.03
>
>Exit Rate: units are threads exiting per second.
>Calculated by (#threads_forked+exited)/(elapsed_time)/2
>Since app pretty much does only thread create and exit for 10000
>threads (1000 threads, 10 iterations), this is a good measure
>for exit rate.
>
>%diff in user, sys, elapsed times calculated using
>(tgid_on - tgid_off)/tgid_off * 100
>where tgid_on/off times are reported by /usr/bin/time as before.
>
>Each data point for tgid_on and tgid_off was an average
>of 10 runs of the fork+exit benchmark.
>The rate of exits was controlled by delaying the individual
>threads through a usleep before being allowed to exit.
>
>Machine was 4-way 1.6GHz x86_64 Opteron.
>
>"exit_recv -w", the user program consuming the stats, was running
>on the side, reading the stats but not writing to a file or
>printing to screen.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 7:41 [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 10:51 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-09 11:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 13:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 18:25 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 19:12 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 15:36 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-09 18:35 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 19:31 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 21:56 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 22:42 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 23:47 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-10 12:21 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-12 18:31 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-12 21:57 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-10 13:05 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-12 18:54 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:11 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:14 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:34 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 23:35 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 23:45 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 17:14 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 18:19 ` Jay Lan [this message]
2006-06-23 18:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 20:00 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 20:16 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 20:36 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-23 22:07 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 2:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-24 4:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 5:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 17:33 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-26 17:52 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:00 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 18:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:26 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-26 18:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:49 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 19:00 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-28 21:30 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-28 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28 22:02 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-29 8:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 12:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-06-29 16:44 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 18:07 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 18:26 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:15 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:41 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 21:42 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 21:54 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-29 22:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 22:23 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 0:15 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 0:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 1:00 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <44A46C6C.1090405@watson.ibm.com>
2006-06-30 0:38 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 2:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 2:46 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 2:54 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 3:02 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:22 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:23 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 19:43 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:43 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 22:13 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 22:13 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 23:00 ` jamal
2006-06-29 20:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 20:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 21:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 22:54 ` jamal
2006-06-30 0:38 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 0:38 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 1:11 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:11 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:30 ` jamal
2006-06-30 3:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 3:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 12:45 ` jamal
2006-06-30 2:25 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 2:43 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:33 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-30 18:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 18:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:19 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:19 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 20:19 ` jamal
2006-06-30 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 2:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 2:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 2:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 3:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 3:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 3:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 21:11 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 0:13 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 0:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 20:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 20:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 0:54 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 13:05 ` jamal
2006-07-04 15:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 16:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 19:24 ` jamal
2006-07-05 14:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-05 14:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-05 20:25 ` Chris Sturtivant
2006-07-05 20:25 ` Chris Sturtivant
2006-07-05 20:32 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-05 20:32 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 4:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-03 15:02 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 15:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-03 16:31 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 0:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 19:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-05 17:20 ` Jay Lan
2006-07-05 17:20 ` Jay Lan
2006-07-05 18:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-05 18:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 18:05 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-29 12:42 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-24 3:08 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 21:31 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 21:45 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 22:19 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 21:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 15:55 ` Chris Sturtivant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449C30C1.6090802@engr.sgi.com \
--to=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=csturtiv@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.