From: "Raphaël Rigo" <ml-qemu@twilight-hall.net>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>,
Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Pending MIPS patches
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:27:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A018E4.50708@twilight-hall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44A001C7.8040303@gmail.com>
Dirk Behme wrote:
> Hi Raphaël,
>
> maybe you find some time and like to answer to Fabrice's remark
> regarding patch 8
> below?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-06/msg00419.html
>
> Would be nice to get as many of the pending MIPS patches applied as
> possible.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Dirk
>
> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>>> Pending MIPS patches (bugs & improvements):
>>> ===========================================
>
>>> 8. [PATCH] Add mips-user signal handling
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-06/msg00319.html
>>
>>
>> OK. Need to check the handling of "env->PC += 4" in
>> linux-user/main.c. I want to be sure there is not a better solution.
>> Adding setup_rt_frame would be good too.
Hello,
there are 2 possibilities to handle this env->PC += 4:
- do a special case wrapper here to avoid increasing PC when it's
a sigreturn.
- in do_sigreturn set PC with a -4 offset.
I chose the first way because I thought it would be cleaner, if anyone
was to change this part of the code, then it would be clear that
sigreturn directly sets PC. Using the 2nd possibility, one could change
this += 4 without knowing do_sigreturn would be affected.
I also checked if we could get rid of this weird piece of code, but
could not find a clear way to do so.
So i preferred maintainability over efficiency, but if you think
setting PC with an offset of -4 in signal.c is better, tell me and i
will update the patch.
Thanks for reviewing,
Raphaël
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-26 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-25 16:12 [Qemu-devel] Pending MIPS patches Dirk Behme
2006-06-25 16:39 ` Fabrice Bellard
2006-06-26 9:35 ` Marius Groeger
2006-06-26 15:35 ` Dirk Behme
2006-06-26 20:17 ` Fabrice Bellard
2006-06-27 15:45 ` MIPS instruction set configuration, was: " Dirk Behme
2006-06-27 15:55 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: MIPS instruction set configuration Marius Groeger
2006-06-27 20:57 ` Fabrice Bellard
2006-07-02 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] " Dirk Behme
2006-07-02 23:16 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-03 8:32 ` Fabrice Bellard
2006-07-03 9:50 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-03 14:32 ` Dirk Behme
2006-07-03 14:53 ` Fabrice Bellard
2006-07-08 6:15 ` Dirk Behme
2006-07-03 14:20 ` Dirk Behme
2006-07-03 17:02 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-03 18:41 ` Stefan Weil
2006-07-03 19:58 ` Thiemo Seufer
2006-07-08 6:19 ` Dirk Behme
2006-07-08 12:47 ` Thiemo Seufer
[not found] ` <44A001C7.8040303@gmail.com>
2006-06-26 17:27 ` Raphaël Rigo [this message]
2006-06-27 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] Pending MIPS patches Fabrice Bellard
2006-06-27 21:15 ` Fabrice Bellard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A018E4.50708@twilight-hall.net \
--to=ml-qemu@twilight-hall.net \
--cc=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=fabrice@bellard.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.