From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@bull.net>,
sho@tnes.nec.co.jp, cmm@us.ibm.com,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:10:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A417A3.80001@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060628202421.GL5318@schatzie.adilger.int>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2006 17:50 +0200, Johann Lombardi wrote:
>>ext2/ext3_dir_entry_2 has a 16-bit entry(rec_len) and it would overflow
>>with 64KB blocksize. This patch prevent from overflow by limiting
>>rec_len to 65532.
>
> Having a max rec_len of 65532 is rather unfortunate, since the dir
> blocks always need to filled with dir entries. 65536 - 65532 = 4, and
> the minimum ext3_dir_entry size is 8 bytes. I would instead make this
> maybe 64 bytes less so that there is room for a filename in the "tail"
> dir_entry.
Then why not introduce a little symmetry by making max rec_len 2**15 and
treat big directory blocks as an array of smaller ones? I dimly recall
the page-cache oriented Ext2 dir code already does this.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-28 11:52 [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow sho
2006-06-28 15:50 ` Johann Lombardi
2006-06-28 20:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 10:46 ` [Ext2-devel] [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_lenoverflow Takashi Sato
2006-06-29 16:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 18:10 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2006-06-29 20:27 ` [RFC 1/2] ext3: enlarge blocksize and fix rec_len overflow Andreas Dilger
2006-06-29 22:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-06-30 9:31 ` Johann Lombardi
2006-06-30 18:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-07-01 8:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-07-01 10:27 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-07-05 18:41 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44A417A3.80001@google.com \
--to=phillips@google.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=johann.lombardi@bull.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.