From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44C5A629.8090602@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607250757.00643.a1426z@gawab.com>
Al Boldi wrote:
> Rejection of content should be based on technical merits only, and no process
> guidelines should stay in the way of its preliminary acceptance. Otherwise,
> we would be asking for a return to a bureaucratic system that inhibits
> innovation, which I'm sure is not the intention of anybody, I hope.
The most perfect filesystem in the world would be rejected, if it lacked
a maintainer and/or is otherwise undebuggable or unmaintainable.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-25 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-24 15:57 the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org Al Boldi
2006-07-24 17:43 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-07-24 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-25 4:07 ` Matthew Frost
2006-07-25 4:57 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-25 5:03 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-07-25 8:33 ` the ' 'official' point of view' " Luigi Genoni
2006-07-25 14:35 ` the " 'official' point of view" " Horst H. von Brand
2006-07-25 15:14 ` Lexington Luthor
2006-07-25 20:59 ` Matthias Andree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-15 21:27 Tom Reinhart
2006-08-15 21:55 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-15 22:06 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-08-15 22:20 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-16 2:34 ` Tom Reinhart
2006-08-16 3:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2006-08-15 22:27 ` David Masover
2006-08-15 22:44 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-08-15 23:29 ` David Masover
2006-08-16 1:14 ` Gregory Maxwell
2006-08-16 4:23 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-16 15:08 ` Ric Wheeler
2006-08-16 22:48 ` Hans Reiser
2006-08-24 16:11 ` PFC
2006-08-16 2:53 ` Tom Reinhart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44C5A629.8090602@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.