* multiple subnets on the same physical interface
@ 2006-07-29 1:02 MY
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: MY @ 2006-07-29 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello list,
I have a weird problem - my setup looks like this:
Internet -- FW eth0 / eth1 -- switch
On eth0 I have 14 IP addresses from ISP, and on eth1 I have few C class
networks, which are also public IPs and should be accessible from the
Internet as with usual router.
There are 7 subnets on eth1, and even if I install quad card with 4
physical interfaces in that machine, there are no more slots to get more
interfaces.
And there will be 2-3 more subnets in the future.
Thing is that ip routing works fine (this is a cluster with keepalived
setup) when there is no iptables on it.
As soon as I enable stateful firewall with iptables with Any - Any - Any
- Accept rule with INPUT/OUTPUT/FORWARD policies with DROP flag,
communication goes to some subnets, and fails for others.
Seems like packets are leaving from 1 subnet I am on, and nothing comes
in return, and I don't see any drops in logs either.
When I tested it, I manually stopped keepalived on first node (it has no
iptables on it at this point), switched over to secondary node without
iptables enabled, then enabled firewall on second box.
If I use stateless firewall - all is working fine.
However, as soon as I add following lines, I am starting to get problems
to few boxes. What's weird is that not all of them are having problems,
just a few - while all of them are standing on the same subnet (both
problemfree and problematic machines). I am trying to narrow source of
the problem, but so far I am out of ideas what can be wrong. Somehow it
seems to be related to states in iptables.
We're running Linux Gentoo 2.6.17.4 kernel on both routers/firewalls,
not using subinterfaces but rather iproute2 package.
Here are parameters we have:
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
echo "Rule 0 (global)"
#
#
#
$IPTABLES -N RULE_0
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW -j RULE_0
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -j RULE_0
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state NEW -j RULE_0
$IPTABLES -A RULE_0 -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix "RULE 0 --
ACCEPT " --log-tcp-sequence --log-tcp-options --log-ip-opti
ons
$IPTABLES -A RULE_0 -j ACCEPT
#
#
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_redirects
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_all
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses
echo 30 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
echo 1800 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal
If anyone have any ideas what might be wrong, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
M.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-07-29 1:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-29 1:02 multiple subnets on the same physical interface MY
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.