From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: sho@tnes.nec.co.jp, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] fix ext3 mounts at 16T
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:39:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E5FB5D.60403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44E5F9F0.6030805@us.ibm.com>
Mingming Cao wrote:
> Yes, this isn't being addressed in the current 2.6.18-rc4 kernel. I
> think this is better than casting to unsigned long long:
>
> - if ((my_rsv->rsv_start >= group_first_block + EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))
> + if ((my_rsv->rsv_start > group_first_block - 1 + EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))
And there are a few more of these. The patch I currently have in my stack follows.
(personally I think
last = first + (count - 1)
is clearer than
last = first - 1 + count
but that's just my opinion...)
Thanks,
-Eric
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Index: linux-2.6.17/fs/ext3/balloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17.orig/fs/ext3/balloc.c
+++ linux-2.6.17/fs/ext3/balloc.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ goal_in_my_reservation(struct ext3_reser
ext3_fsblk_t group_first_block, group_last_block;
group_first_block = ext3_group_first_block_no(sb, group);
- group_last_block = group_first_block + EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1;
+ group_last_block = group_first_block + (EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1);
if ((rsv->_rsv_start > group_last_block) ||
(rsv->_rsv_end < group_first_block))
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int alloc_new_reservation(struct
spinlock_t *rsv_lock = &EXT3_SB(sb)->s_rsv_window_lock;
group_first_block = ext3_group_first_block_no(sb, group);
- group_end_block = group_first_block + EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1;
+ group_end_block = group_first_block + (EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1);
if (grp_goal < 0)
start_block = group_first_block;
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ ext3_try_to_allocate_with_rsv(struct sup
try_to_extend_reservation(my_rsv, sb,
*count-my_rsv->rsv_end + grp_goal - 1);
- if ((my_rsv->rsv_start >= group_first_block + EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))
+ if ((my_rsv->rsv_start > group_first_block + (EXT3_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - 1))
|| (my_rsv->rsv_end < group_first_block))
BUG();
ret = ext3_try_to_allocate(sb, handle, group, bitmap_bh, grp_goal,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-18 9:15 [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] fix ext3 mounts at 16T sho
2006-08-18 14:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-08-18 17:33 ` Mingming Cao
2006-08-18 17:39 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2006-08-18 18:53 ` Mingming Cao
2006-08-18 23:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-08-18 23:56 ` Eric Sandeen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-11 22:13 Eric Sandeen
2006-08-11 22:29 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2006-08-18 8:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-08-14 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-14 23:02 ` [Ext2-devel] " Eric Sandeen
2006-08-16 11:45 ` Johann Lombardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E5FB5D.60403@redhat.com \
--to=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.