Re: acpi gets wrong interrupt for via sata in 2.6.16.17

["Scott J. Harmon" <harmon@ksu.edu>]

This is _still_ a problem with 2.6.17.11

Thanks,

Scott.

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:47:35 -0700
> Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:14:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> I have both reversion patches queued up but haven't heard from
>>> anyone about anything.
>> i saw that --- i don't think it's right, but it's not more wrong than
>> having that merged as-is in the first place which i'll argue is wrong
>> by virtue of the fact we run the quirk everywhere and apparently break
>> things
>>
>>> I don't know if anyone's working on this bug.
>> it's not forgotten, i'm waiting to hear back from people still.
>> enabling ACPI *should* suffice, but for some people clearly it doesn't
>> (there are claims VIA got their ACPI wrong so this might explain why
>> it works for some people and not others)
>>
>>> Thursday is my subsystem-maintainer-spamming day, so the reverts
>>> will be heading Gregwards today.
>> like i said, i really don't think reverting the patches is technically
>> correct, but given that i don't have adequate hardware to test against
>> it might be the least painful option right now
> 
> Yes, it's a question of whose machines we choose to break.
> 
> It'd be great to get this thing nailed.  Do the people who are out testing
> things need re-asking?  
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
"Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about
telescopes." - Edsger Dijkstra