From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: xgmac: fix initializer element is not constant error
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:31:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c29a45-86fa-4e41-b4b5-e69187f0712e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212154319.907447-1-shiftee@posteo.net>
On 2/12/2024 7:43 AM, Mark O'Donovan wrote:
> GCC prior to 8.x gives an "initializer element is not constant"
> error for the uses of dpp_tx_err in dwxgmac3_dma_dpp_errors.
> Newer compilers accept either version.
>
> More info here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240103-fix-bq24190_charger-vbus_desc-non-const-v1-1-115ddf798c70@kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net>
> ---
I'm not sure whether the Linux kernel project has an explicit cutoff for
what versions of GCC (or other compilers) are supported. GCC 8 was first
released in 2018.
The fix provided here is fairly straight forward, and while I do think
the benefit of using builtin types vs using the macros is nice, I don't
see that as a strong enough reason to hold up supporting the older compiler.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> index 323c57f03c93..c02c035b81c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> @@ -830,8 +830,8 @@ static const struct dwxgmac3_error_desc dwxgmac3_dma_errors[32]= {
> { false, "UNKNOWN", "Unknown Error" }, /* 31 */
> };
>
> -static const char * const dpp_rx_err = "Read Rx Descriptor Parity checker Error";
> -static const char * const dpp_tx_err = "Read Tx Descriptor Parity checker Error";
> +#define dpp_rx_err "Read Rx Descriptor Parity checker Error"
> +#define dpp_tx_err "Read Tx Descriptor Parity checker Error"
> static const struct dwxgmac3_error_desc dwxgmac3_dma_dpp_errors[32] = {
> { true, "TDPES0", dpp_tx_err },
> { true, "TDPES1", dpp_tx_err },
>
> base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: xgmac: fix initializer element is not constant error
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:31:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c29a45-86fa-4e41-b4b5-e69187f0712e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212154319.907447-1-shiftee@posteo.net>
On 2/12/2024 7:43 AM, Mark O'Donovan wrote:
> GCC prior to 8.x gives an "initializer element is not constant"
> error for the uses of dpp_tx_err in dwxgmac3_dma_dpp_errors.
> Newer compilers accept either version.
>
> More info here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240103-fix-bq24190_charger-vbus_desc-non-const-v1-1-115ddf798c70@kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@posteo.net>
> ---
I'm not sure whether the Linux kernel project has an explicit cutoff for
what versions of GCC (or other compilers) are supported. GCC 8 was first
released in 2018.
The fix provided here is fairly straight forward, and while I do think
the benefit of using builtin types vs using the macros is nice, I don't
see that as a strong enough reason to hold up supporting the older compiler.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> index 323c57f03c93..c02c035b81c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
> @@ -830,8 +830,8 @@ static const struct dwxgmac3_error_desc dwxgmac3_dma_errors[32]= {
> { false, "UNKNOWN", "Unknown Error" }, /* 31 */
> };
>
> -static const char * const dpp_rx_err = "Read Rx Descriptor Parity checker Error";
> -static const char * const dpp_tx_err = "Read Tx Descriptor Parity checker Error";
> +#define dpp_rx_err "Read Rx Descriptor Parity checker Error"
> +#define dpp_tx_err "Read Tx Descriptor Parity checker Error"
> static const struct dwxgmac3_error_desc dwxgmac3_dma_dpp_errors[32] = {
> { true, "TDPES0", dpp_tx_err },
> { true, "TDPES1", dpp_tx_err },
>
> base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-12 15:43 [PATCH] net: stmmac: xgmac: fix initializer element is not constant error Mark O'Donovan
2024-02-12 15:43 ` Mark O'Donovan
2024-02-14 20:31 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2024-02-14 20:31 ` Jacob Keller
2024-02-14 22:07 ` Mark O'Donovan
2024-02-14 22:07 ` Mark O'Donovan
2024-02-15 10:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-15 10:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-15 17:31 ` Jacob Keller
2024-02-15 17:31 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44c29a45-86fa-4e41-b4b5-e69187f0712e@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shiftee@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.