From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rhim@cc.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] Guest page hinting: unused / free pages.
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:45:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4508198E.10707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45080262.8050009@watson.ibm.com>
Hubertus Franke wrote:
> But another trouble you have not mentioned is what happens to pages
> with pending make-volatile that need to and/or have been made stable
> in the meantime. They too need to be removed from this pending list.
At the time where you walk the set of pages (pagevec?) to make
volatile, you can check whether the page flags are still right.
A page that was set to be marked volatile with the hypervisor,
but later turned stable again would have that indicated in its
page flags, right?
--
What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 11:09 [patch 1/9] Guest page hinting: unused / free pages Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-01 15:33 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 15:33 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 15:43 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-01 15:56 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 15:56 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 16:05 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-01 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-01 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2006-09-12 22:47 ` Rik van Riel
2006-09-13 0:07 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 0:07 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2006-09-13 8:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 8:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 12:06 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 12:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 12:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 13:06 ` Hubertus Franke
2006-09-13 14:45 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2006-09-13 14:59 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 14:59 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-09-13 17:05 ` Hubertus Franke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-24 14:29 Martin Schwidefsky, Martin Schwidefsky, Hubertus Franke, Himanshu Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4508198E.10707@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rhim@cc.gatech.edu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.