From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc7-git1: AHCI not seeing devices on ICH8 mobo (DG965RY)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:53:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450F69C3.8060603@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450E13D4.10200@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jeff, we've been ignoring PI in ahci_host_init()...
>
> for (i = 0; i < probe_ent->n_ports; i++) {
> #if 0 /* BIOSen initialize this incorrectly */
> if (!(hpriv->port_map & (1 << i)))
> continue;
> #endif
>
> The comment suggests that some BIOSen initialize PI incorrectly which
> will probably result in undetected ports. Is this true? Would it be
> dangerous to honor PI on some controllers? If so, PI should be used
> only for controllers which does non-linear port mapping.
The core problem is that this register is write-once after reset, i.e.
BIOS-initialized. And my experience with pre-production machines has
been that after reset _by the driver_, the register was useless until
initialized to a value... _by the driver_. Which defeats the purpose of
the register.
So the info contained in the register is quite useful -- when info is
contained in the register. :)
Now, granted, I have only seen this on pre-production machines, hence
the #if 0. But also, since the code has been disabled in production, we
don't know how effective it is across all platforms, and we _do_ know
that it is ineffective if used directly after a reset. The write-once
behavior is documented, and normal.
We can't really know which controllers have a non-linear port mapping,
because that is dependent on both the silicon and whether or not the
chip is connected to port X[0-31]. The BIOS knows this, of course :)
We can try to enable the code, but I worry that it will fail in
situations such as kexec.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-19 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-14 20:05 2.6.18-rc7-git1: AHCI not seeing devices on ICH8 mobo (DG965RY) Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-14 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-14 20:50 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-16 20:38 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-16 21:08 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-17 7:49 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-18 3:48 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-18 3:34 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-19 3:53 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-09-19 4:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-19 6:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-19 6:24 ` Tejun Heo
2006-09-25 21:39 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-09-19 7:03 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-05 6:21 ` Kurtis D. Rader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450F69C3.8060603@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robbat2@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.