From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux (linux@arm.linux.org.uk)"
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
"Tony Lindgren (tony@atomide.com)" <tony@atomide.com>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
"Omar Ramirez Luna (omar.ramirez@copitl.com)"
<omar.ramirez@copitl.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mailbox driver framework for v3.10 merge window
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 15:49:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4518021.h47erc1rfT@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYSnNeO8F-1WWN9J+pkMi6B_Qydo85QovbgWOEoDDS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 03 May 2013 15:39:42 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote:
> >>
> >> I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the
> >> series adds the driver, and would have to wait until the RFC is sorted
> >> out otherwise.
> >
> > I think I'd prefer to drop the branch from the 3.10 queue then
> > and let you all work out a common approach for 3.11. Olof, any
> > other input?
>
> This will block all refactoring of the PRCMU driver, which Loic
> is working on, and also Ulf Hansson's clock driver. It is basically
> the key to breaking that driver apart and distributing it out into
> the proper subsystems. Loic has a big patch series for that
> for next merge window which will then have to be postponed,
> or queued on top of the mailbox work when finished.
>
> But maybe it's the right thing to do if the subsystem needs more
> work? I have no clear opinion on this, Loic, Ulf?
I think we can queue them together. I'm certainly fine with the
mailbox subsystem getting merged through both the mfd and arm-soc
trees to avoid conflicts.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] mailbox driver framework for v3.10 merge window
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 15:49:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4518021.h47erc1rfT@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYSnNeO8F-1WWN9J+pkMi6B_Qydo85QovbgWOEoDDS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 03 May 2013 15:39:42 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2013 17:09:07 Suman Anna wrote:
> >>
> >> I do not know how much of an impact it is for the ST driver as the
> >> series adds the driver, and would have to wait until the RFC is sorted
> >> out otherwise.
> >
> > I think I'd prefer to drop the branch from the 3.10 queue then
> > and let you all work out a common approach for 3.11. Olof, any
> > other input?
>
> This will block all refactoring of the PRCMU driver, which Loic
> is working on, and also Ulf Hansson's clock driver. It is basically
> the key to breaking that driver apart and distributing it out into
> the proper subsystems. Loic has a big patch series for that
> for next merge window which will then have to be postponed,
> or queued on top of the mailbox work when finished.
>
> But maybe it's the right thing to do if the subsystem needs more
> work? I have no clear opinion on this, Loic, Ulf?
I think we can queue them together. I'm certainly fine with the
mailbox subsystem getting merged through both the mfd and arm-soc
trees to avoid conflicts.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 21:48 [GIT PULL] mailbox driver framework for v3.10 merge window Anna, Suman
2013-04-04 21:48 ` Anna, Suman
2013-04-09 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-09 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-09 15:33 ` Anna, Suman
2013-04-09 15:33 ` Anna, Suman
2013-04-29 4:07 ` Jassi Brar
2013-04-29 4:07 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-02 22:09 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-02 22:09 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-03 2:37 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-03 2:37 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-03 16:29 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-03 16:29 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-03 13:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-03 13:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-03 13:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-03 13:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-03 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-05-03 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] <CAFiDJ5_++vtnrExrRoAbn89GmuKycE_tuWGjPHXTw_E0SycLpg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-13 15:59 ` Suman Anna
[not found] <CAFiDJ5_1w+M6TTroeQEjOcc5GNN2RCmLN4ZB5dxQNwoc+9R1YQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-16 20:14 ` Suman Anna
2013-06-17 20:01 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4518021.h47erc1rfT@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=omar.ramirez@copitl.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.